Distributed Statistical Analyses: A Scoping Review and Examples of Operational Frameworks Adapted to Healthcare
Camirand Lemyre, F.; Levesque, S.; Domingue, M.-P.; Herrmann, K.; Ethier, J.-F.
Show abstract
Data from multiple organizations are crucial for advancing learning health systems. However, ethical, legal, and social concerns may restrict the use of standard statistical methods that rely on pooling data. Although distributed algorithms offer alternatives, they may not always be suitable for healthcare research frameworks. This paper aims to support researchers and data custodians in three ways: (1) providing a concise overview of the literature on statistical inference methods for horizontally partitioned data; (2) describing the methods applicable to generalized linear models (GLM) and assessing their underlying distributional assumptions; (3) adapting existing methods to make them fully usable in healthcare research. A scoping review methodology was employed for the literature mapping, from which methods presenting a methodological framework for GLM analyses with horizontally partitioned data were identified and assessed from the perspective of applicability in healthcare research. From the review, 41 articles were selected, and six approaches were extracted for conducting standard GLM-based statistical analysis. However, these approaches assumed evenly and identically distributed data across nodes. Consequently, statistical procedures were derived to accommodate uneven node sample sizes and heterogeneous data distributions across nodes. Workflows and detailed algorithms were developed to highlight information-sharing requirements and operational complexity.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Time Series Experimental Design Under One-Shot Sampling: The Importance of Condition Diversity 95%
- Current forecast of COVID-19: a Bayesian and Machine Learning approaches 95%
- Prediction of Covid-19 spreading and optimal coordination of counter-measures: From microscopic to macroscopic models to Pareto fronts 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Causal Analysis for Multivariate Integrated Clinical and Environmental Exposures Data 93%
- Combining symbolic regression with the Cox proportional hazards model improves prediction of heart failure deaths 93%
- Addressing Label Noise for Electronic Health Records: Insights from Computer Vision for Tabular Data 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A methodology of phenotyping ICU patients from EHR data: high-fidelity, personalized, and interpretable phenotypes estimation 93%
- Individual Reference Intervals for Personalized Interpretation of Clinical and Metabolomics Measurements 92%
- A Utility-Based Machine Learning-Driven Personalized Lifestyle Recommendation for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.