Back

Using computational approaches to enhance the interpretation of missense variants in the PAX6 gene

Andhika, N. S.; Biswas, S.; Hardcastle, C.; Green, D.; Ramsden, S.; Birney, E. J.; Black, G. C.; Sergouniotis, P.

2023-12-26 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2023.12.21.23300370 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeThe PAX6 gene encodes a highly-conserved transcription factor involved in eye development. Heterozygous loss-of-function variants in PAX6 can cause a range of ophthalmic disorders including aniridia. A key molecular diagnostic challenge is that many PAX6 missense changes are presently classified as variants of uncertain significance. While computational tools can be used to assess the effect of genetic alterations, the accuracy of their predictions varies. Here, we evaluated and optimised the performance of computational prediction tools in relation to PAX6 missense variants. MethodsThrough inspection of publicly available resources (including HGMD, ClinVar, LOVD and gnomAD), we identified 241 PAX6 missense variants that were used for model training and evaluation. The performance of ten commonly-used computational tools was assessed and a threshold optimization approach was utilized to determine optimal cut-off values. Validation studies were subsequently undertaken using PAX6 variants from a local database. ResultsAlphaMissense, SIFT4G and REVEL emerged as the best-performing predictors; the optimized thresholds of these tools were 0.967, 0.025, and 0.772, respectively. Combining the prediction from these top-three tools resulted in lower performance compared to using AlphaMissense alone. ConclusionTailoring the use of computational tools by employing optimized thresholds specific to PAX6 can enhance algorithmic performance. Our findings have implications for PAX6 variant interpretation in clinical settings.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Human Mutation
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.1%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 8%
9.0%
3
Journal of Medical Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
4
Translational Vision Science & Technology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.7%
5
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.6%
7
BMC Medical Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
8
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.4%
9
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
10
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
11
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
12
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
13
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
14
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
15
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
17
Ophthalmology Science
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
18
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
19
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.5%
20
Human Genetics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
21
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
22
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
24
Genetic Epidemiology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
25
Human Genomics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
26
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
27
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%