Using computational approaches to enhance the interpretation of missense variants in the PAX6 gene
Andhika, N. S.; Biswas, S.; Hardcastle, C.; Green, D.; Ramsden, S.; Birney, E. J.; Black, G. C.; Sergouniotis, P.
Show abstract
PurposeThe PAX6 gene encodes a highly-conserved transcription factor involved in eye development. Heterozygous loss-of-function variants in PAX6 can cause a range of ophthalmic disorders including aniridia. A key molecular diagnostic challenge is that many PAX6 missense changes are presently classified as variants of uncertain significance. While computational tools can be used to assess the effect of genetic alterations, the accuracy of their predictions varies. Here, we evaluated and optimised the performance of computational prediction tools in relation to PAX6 missense variants. MethodsThrough inspection of publicly available resources (including HGMD, ClinVar, LOVD and gnomAD), we identified 241 PAX6 missense variants that were used for model training and evaluation. The performance of ten commonly-used computational tools was assessed and a threshold optimization approach was utilized to determine optimal cut-off values. Validation studies were subsequently undertaken using PAX6 variants from a local database. ResultsAlphaMissense, SIFT4G and REVEL emerged as the best-performing predictors; the optimized thresholds of these tools were 0.967, 0.025, and 0.772, respectively. Combining the prediction from these top-three tools resulted in lower performance compared to using AlphaMissense alone. ConclusionTailoring the use of computational tools by employing optimized thresholds specific to PAX6 can enhance algorithmic performance. Our findings have implications for PAX6 variant interpretation in clinical settings.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- REVEL is better at predicting pathogenicity of loss-of-function than gain-of-function variants 94%
- AutoPVS1: An automatic classification tool for PVS1 interpretation of null variants 93%
- Using single molecule Molecular Inversion Probes as a cost-effective, high-throughput sequencing approach to target all genes and loci associated with macular diseases 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing performance of pathogenicity predictors using clinically-relevant variant datasets 95%
- A comparative medical genomics approach may facilitate the interpretation of rare missense variation 93%
- De novo coding variants in the AGO1 gene cause a neurodevelopmental disorder with intellectual disability 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comprehensive simulation and interpretation of single nucleotide substitutions in GJB2 reveals the genetic and phenotypic landscape of GJB2-related hearing loss 93%
- Horizon: CNV interpretation through rapid automated ACMG-aligned pathogenicity analysis 92%
- Novel Loss-of-Function Mutations in COCH Cause Autosomal Recessive Nonsyndromic Deafness 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Towards robust clinical genome interpretation: developing a consistent terminology to characterize disease-gene relationships - allelic requirement, inheritance modes and disease mechanisms 94%
- Reducing Sanger Confirmation Testing through False Positive Prediction Algorithms 93%
- Disease-specific ACMG/AMP guidelines improve sequence variant interpretation for hearing loss 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.