A participatory action research study to explore adolescents experiences of adverse childhood experiences through creative workshops: a protocol
Butcher, I.; Mankee Williams, A.; Hugh-Jones, S.; Cooke, P.; Teasdale, B.; Shaughnessy, N.; Pavarini, G.; Smith, L.; Bhui, K.
Show abstract
IntroductionAdverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) are associated with poor mental health in adolescence. There are critical gaps in understanding how and why ACEs are experienced by particular groups of young people and what factors contribute to risk and resilience. This research aims to: a) understand the lived experiences by which ACEs in diverse young people unfold to affect their mental health and b) utilise and understand how novel creative and participatory arts approaches can contribute new knowledge about ACEs to inform future interventions for adolescent mental health. Methods and analysisAn interdisciplinary collaboration, this utilises a blended mixed-methods approach as a triangulation between qualitative research methods, arts-based practice research and a participatory-community-research model. Framework-analysis is utilised as is appropriate to the complexities of data collection in interdisciplinary studies, working across teams, combining analysis of themes across a group (ACE-affected adolescents) with consideration of individual participants through interviews and creative media. This study will recruit 100 young people aged between 10-24 in England in; Cornwall, Kent, Leeds, London and Oxfordshire. This study is part of a larger project by the same authors, investigating adolescent mental health. In this discovery phase, creative practices are being used in conjunction with qualitative methods of data analysis to enable us to elicit, examine lived experience and youth voice as core features of enquiry. This facilitates understanding of the role of creative practices in helping young people share the events in their lives that they feel have been significant in shaping their views of themselves, of others and of their current mental health and wellbeing. Ethics and disseminationThis study is sponsored by the University of Oxford. Ethical approval obtained from institution (R71941/RE001) and NHS Health Research Authority committees. (23/WM/0105) The outputs from this study will be shared, locally, nationally and globally. Strengths and Limitations (five)- This study aims to understand the lived experiences of adolescents aged between 10-24 regarding adverse childhood experiences (ACEs). - This study is recruiting adolescents from a range of communities and geographic localities in England, including, rural and urban. - There is a plethora of research examining the association between ACEs and mental health outcomes, but a paucity of research has employed a blended mixed method approach utilising qualitive research methods, arts-based practice and a participatory community research model. - This study will purposively endeavour to ensure each adolescents voice is heard and the study will engage with those individuals who may otherwise not be able to participate in research. - This study is focused on recruiting in England and thus the findings it is hoped will be useful to policymakers and clinicians in the devolved nations but the authors recognise that adolescents in the devolved nations may have experienced different ACEs to those adolescents in this study.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Co-design and evaluation of a youth-informed organisational tool to enhance trauma-informed practices in the UK public sector: a study protocol 96%
- Exploring High Mortality Rates Among People With Multiple And Complex Needs: A Qualitative Study Using Peer Research Methods 95%
- “When will this end? Will it end?” The impact of the March-June 2020 UK Covid-19 lockdown response on mental health: a longitudinal survey of mothers in the Born in Bradford study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mapping young people’s journeys through mental health services: a prospective longitudinal qualitative study protocol 97%
- Trialling an Optimised social Groups intervention in services to Enhance social connecTedness and mental Health in vulnERable young people (TOGETHER): Study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial 95%
- Co-production of an online research and resource platform for improving the health of young people - The HYPE Project 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- ‘I had no life. I was only existing’ . Factors shaping the mental health and wellbeing of people experiencing long Covid: a qualitative study 94%
- Effectiveness, acceptability and potential harms of peer support for self-harm in non-clinical settings: A systematic review 94%
- The mental health of NHS staff during the COVID-19 pandemic: a two-wave cohort study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Priorities for Future Research about Screen Use and Adolescent Mental Health: A Participatory Prioritization Study 95%
- Recovery from severe mental health problems: A systematic review of service user and informal caregiver perspectives 93%
- Business as Un-usual: Access to mental health and primary care services for people with severe mental illness during the COVID-19 restrictions 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of COVID-19 on the lives and mental health of Australian adolescents 95%
- Understanding priorities and needs for child and adolescent mental health in Greece from multiple informants: an open resource 93%
- What Treatment Outcomes Matter Most? A Q-study of Outcome Priority Profiles Among Youth with Lived Experience of Depression 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.