Evaluation of non-contact infrared thermometers for COVID-19 fever screening in healthcare workers: A prospective observational study in a tertiary care hospital
Rajakumar, R.; Dorairajan, S. K.; Magesh, P.; Kalyani, P.; Soundarajan, P.
Show abstract
BackgroundIn the fight against COVID-19, efficient fever screening was essential to curb transmission. Fever served as a cardinal symptom, aiding early and timely identification of fever among healthcare workers (HCWs) was crucial. While non-contact infrared thermometers (NCITs) offered non-invasive screening, existing data gaps were present. This study aimed to assess the NCIT effectiveness in HCW fever screening by comparing results with serology and RT-PCR tests, ascertaining their utility in healthcare settings for COVID-19 detection. MethodsThis prospective observational study was conducted at a dedicated COVID-19 tertiary care hospital with 250 beds in South India. The study population comprised 736 healthcare workers (HCWs) working in the hospital, and the study was carried out between April 2020 and December 2020. Daily fever screening using non-contact infrared thermometers (NCITs) was performed on all HCWs upon their entry to the hospital. Additionally, serological tests were offered to all HCWs starting from November 2020 to assess prior COVID-19 infection exposure. COVID-19 admissions were closely monitored during the study period to identify hospitalized HCWs with symptoms who subsequently tested positive for COVID-19 using RT-PCR. ResultsIn this study cohort of 736 HCWs, 44,836 NCIT screenings revealed no fever cases. The serological analysis identified prior COVID-19 exposure in 229 HCWs. McNemars test ({chi}2 = 26.27, p < 0.05) emphasized discordance between NCIT and serology. ROC analysis yielded an AUC of 0.500, indicating NCITs challenge in distinguishing febrile cases. Additionally, 68 symptomatic HCWs tested COVID-19 positive through RT-PCR, highlighting the role of complementary diagnostics. ConclusionThe failure of NCIT to identify fever cases in our study highlights the importance of incorporating supplementary screening methods and comprehensive strategies in future pandemic preparedness.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk perceptions and preventive practices of COVID-19 among healthcare professionals in public hospitals in Ethiopia 95%
- Risk perceptions and preventive practices of COVID-19 among healthcare professionals in public hospitals in Ethiopia 95%
- Evaluating diagnostic accuracies of Panbio ™ COVID-19 rapid antigen test and RT-PCR for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia using Bayesian Latent-Class Models (BLCM) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies before and after implementation of anti-COVID-19 vaccination among hospital staff in Bangui, Central African Republic 94%
- Health care workers’ self-perceived infection risk and COVID-19 vaccine uptake: a mixed methods study 94%
- Corona virus fear among health workers during the early phase of pandemic response in Nepal: a web-based cross-sectional study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 and associated risk factors among healthcare workers in the Eastern Cape, South Africa 95%
- High risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection among frontline healthcare workers in Northeast Brazil: a respondent-driven sampling approach 93%
- Epidemiology of COVID-19 and effect of public health interventions, Chennai, India, March - October 2020 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy and analytical sensitivity of the novel Xpert® Mpox (Cepheid®) and STANDARD™ M10 MPX/OPX (SD Biosensor) molecular point-of-care assays for the detection of Mpox virus in skin lesion swabs and upper-respiratory swab samples 90%
- Novel risk factors for Coronavirus disease-associated mucormycosis (CAM): a case control study during the outbreak in India 90%
- Using Artificial Intelligence-based models to predict the risk of Mucormycosis among COVID-19 Survivors: An Experience from India 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the craft and manual worker population of Qatar 94%
- Prevalence and factors associated with antigen test positivity following SARS-CoV-2 infection among healthcare workers in Los Angeles 93%
- Acceptability, usability and performance of lateral flow immunoassay tests for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies: REACT-2 study of self-testing in non-healthcare key workers 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.