Back

Pressure-Driven Insulin Release Overcomes Limitations of Diffusion for Encapsulated Islet Cell Therapy

Poon, A. S. Y.; Annes, J. P.; Lal, R. A.; Thomson, E. A.; Xu, H.; Lee, S.; Moeller, H.

2023-12-12 bioengineering
10.1101/2023.12.11.570688 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cadaveric islet and stem cell-derived transplantations hold promise as treatments for type 1 diabetes. To tackle the issue of immunocompatibility, numerous cellular macroencapsulation techniques have been developed that utilize diffusion to transport insulin across an immunoisolating barrier. However, despite several devices progressing to human clinical trials, none have successfully managed to attain physiologic glucose control or insulin independence. Based on empirical evidence, macroencapsulation methods with multilayered, high islet surface density are incompatible with homeostatic, on-demand insulin delivery and physiologic glucose regulation, when reliant solely on diffusion. An additional driving force is essential to overcome the distance limit of diffusion. In this study, we present both theoretical proof and experimental validation that applying pressure at levels comparable to physiological diastolic blood pressure significantly enhances insulin flux across immunoisolation membranes--increasing it by nearly three orders of magnitude. This significant enhancement in transport rate allows for precise, sub-minute regulation of both bolus and basal insulin delivery. By incorporating this technique with a pump-based extravascular system, we demonstrate the ability to rapidly reduce glucose levels in diabetic rodent models, effectively replicating the timescale and therapeutic effect of subcutaneous insulin injection or infusion. This advance provides a potential path towards achieving insulin independence with islet macroencapsulation. One Sentence SummaryTowards improved glucose control, applying sub-minute pressure at physiological levels enhances therapeutic insulin transport from macroencapsulated islets.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.