Synthesized Economic Evidence on the Cost-effectiveness of Screening Familial Hypercholesterolemia: A meta-analytic review and Aggregate Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Wang, M.; Jiang, S.; Lu, J.; Tan, K.; Gu, Y.; Li, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundFamilial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a prevalent genetic disorder with global implications for severe cardiovascular diseases. Amid ongoing advancements in genetic disease screening and treatment, the economic evaluation of FH is increasingly vital. Despite numerous studies, international disparities persist, necessitating a comprehensive analysis of the economic assessments of FH screening to provide valuable insights. This study aims to globally examine economic assessments of FH, synthesize evidence, and present economic insights into the impact of FH screening on population equity. MethodsSystematic literature analysis was used to systematically evaluate 19 FH screening economic evaluation studies and synthesize the evidence. Meta-analysis was used to comprehensively explore the total cost-effectiveness and total net health benefit of different FH screening methods. The aggregate Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (DCEA) was utilized to assess the impact of FH screening on population equity. ResultsThe study results reveal significant differences in the economic evaluations of FH across different countries, and we provide detailed descriptions of unique characteristics. The comprehensive results of cost-effectiveness analysis indicate that FH screening is cost-effective in the majority of countries. The meta-analysis synthesizes the economic impacts of Cascade Screening and Universal Screening across various health outcomes. Additionally, our aggregate Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (DCEA) suggests that FH screening strategies have the potential to alleviate health inequalities. ConclusionThis study provides a global perspective on FH economic evaluation. Despite international differences, findings suggest that, in the majority of cases, FH screening is cost-effective, improving health equity and overall population health. The study offers a positive outlook for future health decisions.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Public acceptability of non-pharmaceutical interventions to control a pandemic in the United Kingdom: a discrete choice experiment 92%
- A potential impact of physical distancing on physical and mental health. A rapid narrative umbrella review of meta-analyses on the link between social isolation and health 92%
- Efficacy and safety of GLP-1 receptor agonists versus SGLT-2 inhibitors in overweight/obese patients with or without diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and network meta-analysis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Accuracy and clinical effectiveness of risk prediction tools for pressure injury occurrence: An umbrella review 93%
- Cost-effectiveness of leveraging existing HIV primary health systems and community health workers for hypertension screening and treatment in Africa: an individual-based modelling study 93%
- A Systematic Review of Machine Learning-based Prognostic Models for Acute Pancreatitis: Towards Improving Methods and Reporting Quality 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Global Burden of Covid-19 Restrictions: National, Regional and Global Estimates 91%
- Ethnicity and clinical outcomes in COVID-19A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 90%
- Effectiveness of Rosuvastatin plus Colchicine, Emtricitabine/Tenofovir and a combination of them in Hospitalized Patients with SARS Covid-19 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The potential health impact and healthcare cost savings of different sodium reduction strategies in Canada 90%
- The association of lifestyle with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality based on machine learning: A Prospective Study from the NHANES 90%
- Homebound by COVID19: The Benefits and Consequences of Non-Pharmaceutical Intervention Strategies 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.