Quantifying the impact of the cluster clinic model on geographic service accessibility
Johnstone, K.; Turner, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundTravel distance is a barrier to accessing care, especially in large areas with low population density. The cluster clinic model is designed to provide paediatric scheduled care in the community setting within NHS Grampian. Here, we have quantified the effect on overall travel distance and equality of access. MethodsThree models were compared: All clinics delivered at Royal Aberdeen Childrens Hospital, all clinics delivered at cluster clinics, and clinics at both hospital and cluster clinics. Shortest drivable distance from home to clinic in each model was calculated for all children in Aberdeen City and Aberdeenshire. Equality of distribution was assessed using a Gini coefficient, with values closer to 0 representing better equality, and 1 representing worse equality. ResultsIn model A, median travel distance was 8.64miles (Q1: 2.96miles, Q3: 25.7miles) with a Gini coefficient of 0.491. For model B, median travel distance was 3.14miles (Q1: 1.46miles, Q3: 9.07miles) with a Gini coefficient of 0.480. In model C, median travel distance was 3.13miles (Q1: 1.35miles, Q3: 9.07miles), with a Gini coefficient of 0.490. ConclusionsThe cluster clinic model significantly reduces travel distance, whilst simultaneously improving access equality. This methodology should be considered to prospectively evaluate implementation of similar models elsewhere.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Spatio-temporal modelling of referrals to outpatient respiratory clinics in the integrated care system of the Morecambe Bay area, England 94%
- Revisiting the use and effectiveness of patient-held records in rural Malawi 93%
- Navigating uncertain illness trajectories for young children with serious infectious illness: a mixed-methods modified grounded theory study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 94%
- Cost savings in male circumcision post-operative care continuum in rural and urban South Africa: Evidence on the importance of initial counselling and daily SMS 94%
- “The impact of the Little Orange Book on how parents/carers manage symptoms of illness in children: A mixed methods study” 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Primary care use of laboratory tests in Northern Ireland Western Health and Social Care Trust: a cross-sectional study 93%
- How can rural community-engaged health services planning affect sustainable health care system changes? - A process description and qualitative analysis of data from the Rural Coordination Centre of British Columbia’s Rural Site Visits Project 93%
- What is the suitability of clinical vignettes in benchmarking the performance of online symptom checkers? An audit study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving local authority financial support services for users with complex health needs: a mixed-method economic evaluation of Social Navigators in South Tyneside, UK 94%
- National statutory reporting: not even ticking the boxes? The quality of ‘Learning from Deaths’ reporting in Quality Accounts within the NHS in England 2017-2020 91%
- Family-centered postnatal training and adherence to newborn care practices in district hospitals in two Indian states: A quasi-experimental intervention study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Staff experiences and perspectives of delivering an integrated child health and social care service in community settings: A qualitative exploration using the SELFIE framework 93%
- Understanding the influence of leadership, organisation, and policy on delivering an integrated child health and social care service in community settings: A qualitative exploration using the SELFIE framework 93%
- A novel methodology to measure waiting times for community-based specialist care in a public healthcare system 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.