Reengineering a machine learning phenotype to adapt to the changing COVID-19 landscape: A study from the N3C and RECOVER consortia
Crosskey, M.; McIntee, T.; Preiss, A. J.; Brannock, M. D.; Yoo, Y. J.; Hadley, E. C.; Blancero, F.; Chew, R.; Loomba, J.; Bhatia, A.; Chute, C. G.; Haendel, M.; Moffitt, R.; Pfaff, E.
Show abstract
BackgroundIn 2021, we used the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) as part of the NIH RECOVER Initiative to develop a machine learning (ML) pipeline to identify patients with a high probability of having post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC), or Long COVID. However, the increased home testing, missing documentation, and reinfections that characterize the latter years of the pandemic necessitate reengineering our original model to account for these changes in the COVID-19 research landscape. MethodsOur updated XGBoost model gathers data for each patient in overlapping 100-day periods that progress through time, and issues a probability of Long COVID for each 100-day period. If a patient has known acute COVID-19 during any 100-day window (including reinfections), we censor the data from 7 days prior to the diagnosis/positive test date through 28 days after. These fixed time windows replace the prior models reliance on a documented COVID-19 index date to anchor its data collection, and are able to account for reinfections. ResultsThe updated model achieves an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.90. Precision and recall can be adjusted according to a given use case, depending on whether greater sensitivity or specificity is warranted. DiscussionBy eschewing the COVID-19 index date as an anchor point for analysis, we are now able to assess the probability of Long COVID among patients who may have tested at home, or with suspected (but untested) cases of COVID-19, or multiple SARS-CoV-2 reinfections. We view this exercise as a model for maintaining and updating any ML pipeline used for clinical research and operations.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A Deep Learning Method to Detect Opioid Prescription and Opioid Use Disorder from Electronic Health Records 93%
- Predicting Prognosis in COVID-19 Patients using Machine Learning and Readily Available Clinical Data 92%
- Assessing the effects of data drift on the performance of machine learning models used in clinical sepsis prediction 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modular Clinical Decision Support Networks (MoDN)—Updatable, Interpretable, and Portable Predictions for Evolving Clinical Environments 94%
- Generalizability Challenges of Mortality Risk Prediction Models: A Retrospective Analysis on a Multi-center Database 93%
- Raising awareness of potential biases in medical machine learning: Experience from a Datathon 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.