Back

Large-Scale Information Retrieval and Correction of Noisy Pharmacogenomic Datasets through Residual Thresholded Deep Matrix Factorization

Hu, Z. T.; Yu, Y.; Chen, R.; Yeh, S.-J.; Chen, B.; Huang, H.

2023-12-08 bioinformatics
10.1101/2023.12.07.570723 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Pharmacogenomics studies are attracting an increasing amount of interest from researchers in precision medicine. The advances in high-throughput experiments and multiplexed approaches allow the large-scale quantification of drug sensitivities in molecularly characterized cancer cell lines (CCLs), resulting in a number of open drug sensitivity datasets for drug biomarker discovery. However, a significant inconsistency in drug sensitivity values among these datasets has been noted. Such inconsistency indicates the presence of substantial noise, subsequently hindering downstream analyses. To address the noise in drug sensitivity data, we introduce a robust and scalable deep learning framework, Residual Thresholded Deep Matrix Factorization (RT-DMF). This method takes a single drug sensitivity data matrix as its sole input and outputs a corrected and imputed matrix. Deep Matrix Factorization (DMF) excels at uncovering subtle patterns, due to its minimal reliance on data structure assumptions. This attribute significantly boosts DMFs ability to identify complex hidden patterns among nuisance effects in the data, thereby facilitating the detection of signals that are therapeutically relevant. Furthermore, RT-DMF incorporates an iterative residual thresholding (RT) procedure, which plays a crucial role in retaining signals more likely to hold therapeutic importance. Validation using simulated datasets and real pharmacogenomics datasets demonstrates the effectiveness of our approach in correcting noise and imputing missing data in drug sensitivity datasets (open source package available at https://github.com/tomwhoooo/rtdmf).

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.