Analysis of Engagement with CuidaTEXT, a Text Message Intervention for Dementia Caregiver Support among Latinos
Medina, V.; Watts, A.; Fracachan-Cabrera, M.; Hazlewood, C.; Ramirez-Mantilla, M.; Vidoni, E.; Perales-Puchalt, J.
Show abstract
ObjectivesTo assess the impact of a text message intervention, CuidaTEXT, on participant engagement and its subsequent associations with socio-demographic factors, acceptability measures, and clinical outcomes among Latino dementia caregivers. MethodsCuidaTEXT is a six-month, bilingual, and bidirectional intervention. We enrolled 24 Latino caregivers in a one-arm feasibility trial. Participants received approximately one automatic daily text message and could engage with the intervention by texting specific keywords (e.g., STRESS to receive messages about stress-coping), and by chat-texting with a live coach. We used metrics and psychometric scales to quantify variables. ResultsParticipants sent a total of 1,847 messages to CuidaTEXT. Higher engagement was associated with higher intervention satisfaction (r=0.6, p=0.007), as were several other acceptability outcomes. We found no associations between engagement with CuidaTEXT and sociodemographic or clinical outcomes (p>0.05). ConclusionEncouraging interaction with CuidaTEXT might lead to higher levels of satisfaction with the intervention. However, it might be that those who are highly satisfied, engage more with CuidaTEXT. Future research should determine the directionality of these associations. Clinical ImplicationsIncreasing opportunities to engage in text messaging may increase Latino caregivers satisfaction with caregiver support interventions.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Randomized Clinical Trial of ICECaP (Individualized Coordination and Empowerment for Care Partners of Persons with Dementia): Primary Mental Health and Burden Outcomes 96%
- Effectiveness of dyadic interventions in improving outcomes for adults with multiple long-term conditions and/or frailty and their informal carers: A systematic review protocol 93%
- Top-funded digital health companies offering lifestyle interventions for dementia prevention: Company overview and evidence analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acceptability of a behavioural intervention to mitigate the psychological impacts of COVID-19 restrictions in older people with long-term conditions: a qualitative study 94%
- The impact of patient-centered care on quality of life and hope among patients receiving home medical care: The Zaitaku Evaluative Initiatives and Outcome Study 94%
- Synthesizing evidence regarding community-based volunteer facilitated programs supporting integrated care transitions from hospital to home: A scoping review protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Qualitative Study of People with Alzheimer’s Disease in a Memory Clinic Considering Lecanemab Treatment 92%
- Non-pharmaceutical interventions for persons living with young-onset dementia and their informal caregivers: a systematic review with meta-analysis 92%
- Racial Composition in K-12 Schooling and Cognitive Health of Older Black Adults 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- User Perceptions of Individually-Tailored Health Information in 1 Digital Apps: Development of a Scale 89%
- Implementing Home-Based Digital Health in Rural Canada: A Scoping Review 89%
- Precision Digital Intervention for Depression Based on Social Rhythm Principles Adds Significantly to Outpatient Treatment 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Process evaluation of a New psychosocial goal-setting and manualised support intervention for Independence in Dementia (NIDUS-Family) 95%
- The facilitators and barriers to improving functional activity and wellbeing in people with dementia: A qualitative study from the Process Evaluation of Promoting Activity, Independence and Stability in Early Dementia 95%
- Factors associated with access to virtual care in older adults: A cross-sectional study 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.