Manual Chest PRESSURE during Direct Current Cardioversion for Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomised Control Trial (PRESSURE-AF).
Ferreira, D.; Mikhail, P.; Lim, J.; Ray, M.; Dwivedi, J.; Brienesse, S.; Butel-Simoes, L.; Meere, W.; Bland, A.; Howden, N.; Malaty, M.; Kunda, M.; Kelty, A.; McGee, M.; Boyle, A.; Sverdlov, A. L.; William, M.; Attia, J.; Jackson, N.; Morris, G. M.; Barlow, M.; leitch, j.; Collins, N.; Ford, T. J.; Wilsmore, B.
Show abstract
BackgroundDirect current cardioversion is frequently used to return patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) to sinus rhythm. Chest pressure during cardioversion may improve the efficacy of cardioversion through decreasing transthoracic impedance and increasing cardiac energy delivery. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of upfront chest pressure during direct current cardioversion for atrial fibrillation with anterior-posterior pad positioning. Design, Setting and ParticipantsThis was a multi-center, investigator-initiated, patient and analysis blinded, randomised clinical trial. Recruitment occurred from 2021 to 2023. Follow-up was until hospital discharge. Recruitment occurred across three centers in New South Wales, Australia. Inclusion criteria were age [≥]18, referred for cardioversion for AF, and anticoagulation for three weeks or transoesophageal echocardiography excluding left atrial appendage thrombus. Exclusion criteria were other arrhythmias requiring cardioversion, such as atrial flutter and atrial tachycardia. Intervention and OutcomesThe intervention arm received chest pressure during cardioversion from the first shock. The primary efficacy outcome was total joules required per patient encounter. Secondary efficacy outcomes included first shock success, transthoracic impedance, cardioversion success and sinus rhythm at 30 minutes post cardioversion. Results311 patients were randomised, 153 to control and 158 to intervention. There was no difference in total joules applied per encounter in the control arm versus intervention arm (356.4 {+/-} 301 vs 413.8 {+/-} 347, P=0.25). There was no difference in first shock success, total shocks provided, average impedance and cardioversion success. Conclusions and RelevanceThis study does not support the routine application of chest pressure for direct current cardioversion in atrial fibrillation. Reducing the complexity of cardioversion will improve the efficiency of the procedure for patients and healthcare systems. FundingNone to disclose Trial RegistrationACTRN12620001028998
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Procedural Volume and Outcomes with Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Report from the NCDR AFib Ablation Registry 96%
- Early Experience with Ivabradine for Focal Atrial Tachycardia in Pediatric Patients with Congenital Heart Disease 96%
- Differences in coagulation responses to vascular injury between uninterrupted dabigatran and apixaban - a clinical prospective randomized study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Surgical strategy for atrial functional mitral regurgitation with atrial fibrillation 95%
- Smartwatch Facilitated Remote Health Care for Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Amid COVID-19 Pandemic 95%
- The Effect of Medical Therapy on Reducing the Risk of Pacing Induced Cardiomyopathy 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Anticoagulation trends in adults aged 65 and over with atrial fibrillation; a cohort study 94%
- Machine learning approaches to predict 30-day mortality following percutaneous coronary intervention in an Australian population 92%
- Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on rates of congenital heart disease procedures among children: Prospective cohort analyses of 26,270 procedures in 17,860 children using CVD-COVID-UK consortium record linkage data 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictors and outcomes of Cardiac Dyssynchrony among patients with heart failure attending Benjamin Mkapa Hospital in Dodoma, central Tanzania: A protocol of prospective-longitudinal study 94%
- Sex and racial differences in cardiovascular disease risk in patients with atrial fibrillation 94%
- Multimodal Prehabilitation in People Awaiting Acute Inpatient Cardiac Surgery: Study Protocol for a Pilot Feasibility Trial (PreP-ACe) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pacemaker implantation after cardiac surgery: a contemporary, nationwide perspective 95%
- Evaluation of Indicators of Reproducibility and Transparency in Published Cardiology Literature 93%
- Lifestyle physical activity intensity and rapid-rate non-sustained ventricular tachycardia in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.