Manual Chest PRESSURE during Direct Current Cardioversion for Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomised Control Trial (PRESSURE-AF).
Ferreira, D.; Mikhail, P.; Lim, J.; Ray, M.; Dwivedi, J.; Brienesse, S.; Butel-Simoes, L.; Meere, W.; Bland, A.; Howden, N.; Malaty, M.; Kunda, M.; Kelty, A.; McGee, M.; Boyle, A.; Sverdlov, A. L.; William, M.; Attia, J.; Jackson, N.; Morris, G. M.; Barlow, M.; leitch, j.; Collins, N.; Ford, T. J.; Wilsmore, B.
Show abstract
BackgroundDirect current cardioversion is frequently used to return patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) to sinus rhythm. Chest pressure during cardioversion may improve the efficacy of cardioversion through decreasing transthoracic impedance and increasing cardiac energy delivery. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of upfront chest pressure during direct current cardioversion for atrial fibrillation with anterior-posterior pad positioning. Design, Setting and ParticipantsThis was a multi-center, investigator-initiated, patient and analysis blinded, randomised clinical trial. Recruitment occurred from 2021 to 2023. Follow-up was until hospital discharge. Recruitment occurred across three centers in New South Wales, Australia. Inclusion criteria were age [≥]18, referred for cardioversion for AF, and anticoagulation for three weeks or transoesophageal echocardiography excluding left atrial appendage thrombus. Exclusion criteria were other arrhythmias requiring cardioversion, such as atrial flutter and atrial tachycardia. Intervention and OutcomesThe intervention arm received chest pressure during cardioversion from the first shock. The primary efficacy outcome was total joules required per patient encounter. Secondary efficacy outcomes included first shock success, transthoracic impedance, cardioversion success and sinus rhythm at 30 minutes post cardioversion. Results311 patients were randomised, 153 to control and 158 to intervention. There was no difference in total joules applied per encounter in the control arm versus intervention arm (356.4 {+/-} 301 vs 413.8 {+/-} 347, P=0.25). There was no difference in first shock success, total shocks provided, average impedance and cardioversion success. Conclusions and RelevanceThis study does not support the routine application of chest pressure for direct current cardioversion in atrial fibrillation. Reducing the complexity of cardioversion will improve the efficiency of the procedure for patients and healthcare systems. FundingNone to disclose Trial RegistrationACTRN12620001028998