Back

HIFU Thermal Ablation in Breast Cancer Cells: Monolayers vs. Spheroids

Badawe, H.; Harouz, J. P.; Raad, P.; Abu, K.; Kheir, W. A.; Ghali, K. A.; Khraiche, M.

2023-12-06 bioengineering
10.1101/2023.12.04.569950 bioRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveThe primary objective of our study was to investigate the efficiency of high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation in two distinct cellular configurations, 2D monolayers and 3D spheroids of epithelial breast cancer cell lines. The study also compares empirical findings from experiments with results obtained through numerical simulations using a bioheat computational model. This comparison is intended to provide a comprehensive understanding of the acoustic energy conversion within the biological system during HIFU treatment. MethodsHIFU was applied to 2D and 3D cultured MDA-MB 231 and MCF7 epithelial breast cancer cell lines while systematically varying ultrasound intensity and duty cycle (DC) during sonication sessions of different durations. Temperature elevation was measured and the ablation percentage was calculated based on bright field and fluorescent imaging of the treated regions. Experimental results were validated through simulations of the ablation setup. ResultsUpon HIFU, spheroids exhibited a lower temperature increase (approximately 20 {degrees}C) when subjected to comparable acoustic intensities and duty cycles. The level of tumor ablation was highly influenced by DC, with higher DCs leading to greater ablation percentages. However, sonication duration had a minimal impact on the degree of ablation. Numerical simulations corroborated these observations, demonstrating uniform heat distribution within the cultured cells. At higher DCs and intensities, complete ablation of spheroids was achieved, whereas at lower levels, only the outermost layers exhibited ablation. ConclusionOur study reveals a significant disparity in the response of 2D monolayers and 3D spheroids to HIFU treatment. Specifically, tumor spheroids require lower temperature elevations for effective ablation, and their ablation percentage significantly increases with elevated DC.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.1%
2
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.8%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 7%
8.0%
5
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
6
Photoacoustics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
7
Physics in Medicine & Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
9
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.4%
10
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
11
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.9%
12
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
13
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
14
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
15
Journal of Biomedical Optics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
16
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
17
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
19
Cell Reports Physical Science
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
20
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
30 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
21
Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
Brain Sciences
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
25
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
26
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
28
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%