Comparative Clinical Evaluation of the Alinity m STI Multiplex PCR Assay for Diagnosis and Surveillance of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhea, Trichomonas vaginalis, and Mycoplasma genitalium
Lima, A.; Uy, D.; Kostera, J.; Silbert, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundChlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) are routinely tested and reported; however, Trichomonas vaginalis (TV) is the most common STI in the US and the prevalence of Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) infections is likely higher than estimated. We examined the clinical performance of the Alinity m STI assay for detection and surveillance of CT/NG/TV/MG in urine specimens from patients at a large academic medical center. MethodsPrevalence of mono- and co-infections on Alinity m STI pathogens and predictors of a positive result were identified. Alinity m STI and Aptima Combo 2 CT/NG and TV assay (Panther System) results were compared, with discrepant results run on the cobas 6800 CT/NG, TV and MG assays. Analyzer turnaround times (TAT) were determined for Alinity m and Panther systems. Results199 urine specimens were included. Age [≥]25 years, collection outside the emergency department (ED), and asymptomatic status were predictive of TV or MG infection; symptomatic status was the only predictor of CT or NG infection. Overall agreement rates for the Alinity m, Aptima, and cobas assays ranged from 86.4% to 99.5% for the four pathogens. TV and MG infections comprised 54% of the positive samples and were more often asymptomatic than CT and NG infections. Analyzer TAT (onboard to result reporting) was 4 hours 45 minutes for the Aptima CT/NG, 3 hours 25 minutes for Aptima TV, and 1 hour 55 minutes for Alinity m STI assay. ConclusionsThe Alinity m STI assay allows for fast and simultaneous detection of the four major STI pathogens, which can facilitate surveillance and provide accurate results to help clinicians diagnose for initiation of appropriate treatment.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating the false positive rate of highly automated SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification testing 95%
- Performance and Implementation Evaluation of the Abbott BinaxNOW Rapid Antigen Test in a High-throughput Drive-through Community Testing Site in Massachusetts 95%
- Comparison of the Accula SARS-CoV-2 Test with a Laboratory-Developed Assay for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Clinical Nasopharyngeal Specimens 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance of the Cue COVID-19 Molecular Test for Point of Care: Insights from a multi-site clinic service model 95%
- Analytical Validation of a Highly Accurate and Reliable Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Urine Assay 94%
- Evaluation of the INDICAID™ COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Test in symptomatic populations and asymptomatic community testing 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical evaluation of the Diagnostic Analyzer for Selective Hybridization (DASH): a point-of-care PCR test for rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection 94%
- Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Point of Care Devices in the Laboratory and Clinical Setting 94%
- Performance of the TaqMan™ COVID-19 Pooling Kit for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Asymptomatic and Symptomatic populations at an Institution of Higher Education 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative study of four SARS-CoV-2 Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (NAAT) platforms demonstrates that ID NOW performance is impaired substantially by patient and specimen type. 95%
- SARS-CoV-2 screening in patients in need of urgent inpatient treatment in the Emergency Department (ED) by digitally integrated point-of-care PCR: A clinical cohort study 92%
- Practical strategies for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing in resource-constrained settings 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of a Commercial Culture-free Neutralization Antibody Detection Kit for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Related Coronavirus-2 and Comparison with an Anti-RBD ELISA Assay 92%
- Clinical Ordering Practices of the SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Test at a Large Academic Medical Center 91%
- Impact of Nasopharyngeal Specimen Quality on SARS-CoV-2 Test Sensitivity 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.