Back

Mapping Structural Drivers of Insulin and its Analogs at the IGF-1 Receptor Using Molecular Dynamics and Free Energy Calculations

Ranganathan, A.; Sena, M. M.; C, R.; Gromiha, M.; Chatterji, M.; Khedkar, A.

2023-12-05 biophysics
10.1101/2023.12.02.569705 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Insulin and insulin-like growth factor-1 receptors (IR, IGF-1R) belong to the family of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), and share close structural resemblance. However, these receptors exhibit distinct activity profiles and functions in vivo. Binding of insulin to IGF-1R results in additional growth-factor-like behavior and cell proliferation, but its [~]100-fold reduced affinity to IGF-1R limits off-target activity. However, insulin analogs with increased potency at IGF-1R have oncogenicity as a key safety concern. Hence, the ability to accurately predict potency of novel analogs at IGF-1R could represent a key breakthrough towards rational insulin design. To date, a comprehensive molecular level understanding of insulin interactions at IGF-1R has remained elusive. This study capitalized on recent advancements in structural biology that provided high resolution structures of IGF-1R bound to IGF-1 and insulin. Initially, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were employed to unravel the intricate interactions that characterize the receptor-ligand pairs. Next, free energy perturbation (FEP) calculations were performed to understand the increased affinity observed in insulin analogs, X10 and glargine. Subsequently, multiple mutations at the B10 position of insulin spanning different activities at IGF-1R and different metabolites of insulin glargine, encompassing various mitogenic potencies were studied using FEP. The calculations successfully captured directional shifts in potency for all studied mutants, with approximately 50% of the predicted values falling within 1 kcal/mol of experiment. Beyond its impressive accuracy, FEPs ability to provide a detailed understanding of protein- and solvent-mediated contributions to the observed functional profiles underscores its utility in designing safe IGF-1R selective novel insulin analogs.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.