Back

MetageNN: a memory-efficient neural network taxonomic classifier robust to sequencing errors and missing genomes

Peres da Silva, R.; Suphavilai, C.; Nagarajan, N.

2023-12-02 bioinformatics
10.1101/2023.12.01.569515 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundWith the rapid increase in throughput of long-read sequencing technologies, recent studies have explored their potential for taxonomic classification by using alignment-based approaches to reduce the impact of higher sequencing error rates. While alignment-based methods are generally slower, k-mer-based taxonomic classifiers can overcome this limitation, potentially at the expense of lower sensitivity for strains and species that are not in the database. ResultsWe present MetageNN, a memory-efficient long-read taxonomic classifier that is robust to sequencing errors and missing genomes. MetageNN is a neural network model that uses short k-mer profiles of sequences to reduce the impact of distribution shifts on error-prone long reads. Benchmarking MetageNN against other machine learning approaches for taxonomic classification (GeNet) showed substantial improvements with long-read data (20% improvement in F1 score). By utilizing nanopore sequencing data, MetageNN exhibits improved sensitivity in situations where the reference database is incomplete. It surpasses the alignment-based MetaMaps and MEGAN-LR, as well as the k-mer-based Kraken2 tools, with improvements of 100%, 36%, and 23% respectively at the read-level analysis. Notably, at the community level, MetageNN consistently demonstrated higher sensitivities than the previously mentioned tools. Furthermore, MetageNN requires < 1/4th of the database storage used by Kraken2, MEGAN-LR and MMseqs2 and is >7x faster than MetaMaps and GeNet and >2x faster than MEGAN-LR and MMseqs2. ConclusionThis proof of concept work demonstrates the utility of machine-learning-based methods for taxonomic classification using long reads. MetageNN can be used on sequences not classified by conventional methods and offers an alternative approach for memory-efficient classifiers that can be optimized further.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.