Back

An Efficient Computational Method to Create Positive NIPT Samples with Autosomal Trisomy

Nguyen Huy, T.; Nguyen, H. V.; Pham, M. D.; Le, V. S.

2024-01-15 bioinformatics
10.1101/2023.11.24.568620 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Noninvasive prenatal test (NIPT) has been widely used for screening trisomy on chromosomes 13 (T13), 18 (T18), and 21 (T21). However, the false negative rate of NIPT algorithms has not been thoroughly evaluated due to the lack of positive samples. In this study, we present an efficient computational approach to create positive samples with autosomal trisomy from negative samples. We applied the approach to establish a low coverage dataset of 1440 positive samples with T13, T18, and T21 aberrations for both mosaic and non-mosaic conditions. We examined the performance of WisecondorX and its improvement, called VINIPT, on both negative and positive datasets. Experiments showed that WisecondorX and VINIPT with a z-score threshold of 3.3 were able to detect all non-mosaic samples with T13, T18, and T21 aberrations (i.e., the sensitivity of 100%). Using a lower z-score threshold of 2.58 when analyzing mosaic samples, both WisecondorX and VINIPT have the overall sensitivity of 99.7% on detecting T13, T18, and T21 aberrations from mosaic samples. WisecondorX has the specificity of 98.5% for the non-mosaic analysis, but a considerably lower specificity of 95% for the mosaic analysis. VINIPT has a much better specificity than WisecondorX, i.e., 99.9% for the non-mosaic analysis, and 98.2% for the mosaic analysis. The results suggest that VINIPT can play as a powerful NIPT tool for the low coverage data.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.