Genomic selection for herbage yield in forage oats (Avena sp.)
Rocha, D. J. A.; Flaresso, J. A.; Neto, J. S.; Cordova, U. A.
Show abstract
The study investigated the potential of genomic selection (GS) to accelerate genetic improvement in forage oats (Avena sp.) by predicting herbage yield. The results showed that GS can be an effective tool for predicting herbage yield in forage oats, with prediction accuracies ranging from 0.91 to 0.97. The use of SNP markers for GS in forage oats has several advantages over traditional marker-assisted selection (MAS), including the ability to capture more of the genetic variation for the trait of interest. The accuracy of GS predictions can be further improved by using trait-specific relationship matrices (TGRMs) and genomic information from multiple generations. Key FindingsO_LIGS can be an effective tool for predicting herbage yield in forage oats, with prediction accuracies ranging from 0.91 to 0.97. C_LIO_LIThe use of SNP markers for GS in forage oats has several advantages over traditional MAS, including the ability to capture more of the genetic variation for the trait of interest. C_LIO_LIThe accuracy of GS predictions can be further improved by using TGRMs and genomic information from multiple generations. C_LI ImplicationsO_LIGS can be used to accelerate the development of new forage oat varieties with improved herbage yield. C_LIO_LIGS has the potential to significantly improve the agronomic performance and quality of forage oat varieties. C_LI Future ResearchO_LIDevelop a more structured training population to improve the accuracy of GS predictions. C_LIO_LIIdentify trait-specific relationship matrices (TGRMs) to further improve the accuracy of GS predictions. C_LIO_LIInvestigate the use of genomic information from multiple generations to improve the accuracy of GS predictions. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of Genomic Selection Models for Exploring Predictive Ability of Complex Traits in Breeding Programs 97%
- Multi-Trait Machine and Deep Learning Models for Genomic Selection using Spectral Information in a Wheat Breeding Program 96%
- Genomic selection performs as effectively as phenotypic selection for increasing seed yield in soybean 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Single and Multi-trait Genomic Prediction for agronomic traits in Euterpe edulis 97%
- Improving yield and fruit quality traits in sweet passion fruit: evidence for genotype by environment interaction and cross-compatibility in selected genotypes 95%
- Plant breeders should be determining economic weights for a selection index instead of using independent culling for choosing parents in breeding programs with genomic selection 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of QTL hotspots affecting agronomic traits and high-throughput vegetation indices in rainfed wheat 96%
- Genomic Selection in Rubber Tree Breeding: A Comparison of Models and Methods for dealing with G x E 96%
- Comparison of Single-Trait and Multi-Trait Genome-Wide Association Models and Inclusion of Correlated Traits in the Dissection of the Genetic Architecture of a Complex Trait in a Breeding Program 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing genotype adaptability and stability in perennial forage breeding trials using random regression models for longitudinal dry matter yield data 95%
- Investigating genomic prediction strategies for grain carotenoid traits in a tropical/subtropical maize panel 94%
- Complementary approaches to dissect late leaf rust resistance in an interspecific raspberry population 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Aerial High-Throughput Phenotyping Enabling Indirect Selection for Grain Yield at the Early-generation Seed-limited Stages in Breeding Programs 97%
- DNA Content and Ploidy Estimation of Festuca ovina Accessions by Flow Cytometry 95%
- Reciprocal recurrent selection based on genetic complementation: An efficient way to build heterosis in diploids due to directional dominance 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.