GPT-4 Multimodal Analysis on Ophthalmology Clinical Cases Including Text and Images
Sorin, V.; Kapelushnik, N.; Hecht, I.; Zloto, O.; Glicksberg, B. S.; Bufman, H.; Barash, Y.; Nadkarni, G. N.; Klang, E.
Show abstract
ObjectiveRecent advancements in GPT-4 have enabled analysis of text with visual data. Diagnosis in ophthalmology is often based on ocular examinations and imaging, alongside the clinical context. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of multimodal GPT-4 (GPT-4V) in an integrated analysis of ocular images and clinical text. MethodsThis retrospective study included 40 patients seen in our institution with ocular pathologies. Cases were selected by a board certified ophthalmologist, to represent various pathologies and match the level for ophthalmology residents. We provided the model with each image, without and then with the clinical context. We also asked two non-ophthalmology physicians to write diagnoses for each image, without and then with the clinical context. Answers for both GPT-4V and the non-ophthalmologists were evaluated by two board-certified ophthalmologists. Performance accuracies were calculated and compared. ResultsGPT-4V provided the correct diagnosis in 19/40 (47.5%) cases based on images without clinical context, and in 27/40 (67.5%) cases when clinical context was provided. Non-ophthalmologists physicians provided the correct diagnoses in 24/40 (60.0%), and 23/40 (57.5%) of cases without clinical context, and in 29/40 (72.5%) and 27/40 (67.5%) with clinical context. ConclusionGPT-4V at its current stage is not yet suitable for clinical application in ophthalmology. Nonetheless, its ability to simultaneously analyze and integrate visual and textual data, and arrive at accurate clinical diagnoses in the majority of cases, is impressive. Multimodal large language models like GPT-4V have significant potential to advance both patient care and research in ophthalmology.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Automatic Measurements of Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements by Video-Oculography and Deep Learning-Based Object Detection 94%
- Low-cost, Smartphone-based Specular Imaging and Automated Analysis of the Corneal Endothelium 94%
- Visual field evaluation using Zippy Adaptive Threshold Algorithm (ZATA) Standard and ZATA Fast in patients with glaucoma and healthy individuals 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Towards implementation of AI in New Zealand national screening program: Cloud-based, Robust, and Bespoke 96%
- Glaucoma Detection and Staging from Visual Field Images using Machine Learning Techniques 95%
- Prediction of the ectasia screening index from raw Casia2 volume data for keratoconus identification by using convolutional neural networks 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Unveiling the Clinical Incapabilities: A Benchmarking Study of GPT-4V(ision) for Ophthalmic Multimodal Image Analysis 98%
- Performance of DeepSeek-R1 in Ophthalmology: An Evaluation of Clinical Decision-Making and Cost-Effectiveness 95%
- Autonomous Screening for Laser Photocoagulation in Fundus Images Using Deep Learning 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Detecting papilloedema as a marker of raised intracranial pressure using artificial intelligence: a systematic review 96%
- An Inherently Interpretable AI model improves Screening Speed and Accuracy for Early Diabetic Retinopathy 94%
- Self-supervised contrastive learning improves machine learning discrimination of full thickness macular holes from epiretinal membranes in retinal OCT scans 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.