Back

Efficient Analysis of Annotation Colocalization Accounting for Genomic Contexts

Gafurov, A.; Vinar, T.; Medvedev, P.; Brejova, B.

2023-11-22 bioinformatics
10.1101/2023.11.22.568259 bioRxiv
Show abstract

An annotation is a set of genomic intervals sharing a particular function or property. Examples include genes or their exons, evolutionarily conserved elements, and regions with a particular epigenetic state. A common task is to compare two annotations to determine if one is enriched or depleted in the regions covered by the other. We study the problem of assigning statistical significance to such a comparison based on a null model representing two random unrelated annotations. To incorporate more background information into such analyses, we propose a new null model based on a Markov chain which differentiates among several genomic contexts. These contexts can capture various confounding factors, such as GC content or assembly gaps. We then develop a new algorithm for estimating p-values by computing the exact expectation and variance of the test statistics and then estimating the p-value using a normal approximation. Compared to the previous algorithm by Gafurov et al., the new algorithm provides three advances: (1) the running time is improved from quadratic to linear or quasi-linear, (2) the algorithm can handle two different test statistics, and (3) the algorithm can handle both simple and context-dependent Markov chain null models. We demonstrate the efficiency and accuracy of our algorithm on synthetic and real data sets, including the recent human telomere-to-telomere assembly. In particular, our algorithm computed p-values for 450 pairs of human genome annotations using 24 threads in under three hours. Moreover, the use of genomic contexts to correct for GC bias resulted in the reversal of some previously published findings. AvailabilityThe software is freely available at https://github.com/fmfi-compbio/mcdp2 under the MIT licence. All data for reproducibility are available at https://github.com/fmfi-compbio/mcdp2-reproducibility

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.