Back

EMO: Predicting Non-coding Mutation-induced Up- and Down-regulation of Risk Gene Expression using Deep Learning

Liu, Z.; Bao, Y.; Song, W.; Gu, A.; Lin, G. N.

2023-11-22 bioinformatics
10.1101/2023.11.21.568175 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The challenge of understanding how alterations in non-coding DNA regulate gene expression is substantial, with far-reaching consequences for the advancement of human genetics and disease research. Accurately predicting the up- and down-regulation of gene expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) offers a potential avenue to accelerate the identification of associations between non-coding variants and phenotypic traits. However, current methods for predicting the impact of non-coding mutations on gene expression changes fail to predict the sign of eQTLs accurately. Additionally, the requirement for tissue-specific training models within these methods restricts their applicability, especially when extending predictive abilities to single-cell resolution. In this study, we present EMO, an innovative transformer-based pre-trained method, designed to predict the up- and down-regulation of gene expression caused by single non-coding mutations using DNA sequences and ATAC-seq data. EMO extends the effective prediction range up to 1Mbp between the non-coding mutation and the transcription start site (TSS) of the target gene. It demonstrates competitive prediction performance across various variant TSS distances and surpasses the state-of-the-art structure. To assess its effectiveness, EMO was fine-tuned using eQTLs from two brain tissues for external validation. We also evaluated EMOs transferability to single-cell resolution by fine-tuning it on eQTLs from six types of immune cells, achieving satisfactory results in each cell type (AUC > 0.860). Furthermore, EMO displayed promising potential in analyzing disease-associated eQTLs.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.