Back

Bumble bee microbiota shows temporal succession and increase of lactic acid bacteria when exposed to outdoor environments

Weinhold, A.; Grüner, E.; Keller, A.

2023-11-21 microbiology
10.1101/2023.11.21.568059 bioRxiv
Show abstract

QuestionThe large earth bumble bee (Bombus terrestris) maintains a social core gut-microbiota, similar as known from the honey bee, which plays an important role for host health and resistance. Experiments under laboratory conditions with commercial hives are limited to these vertically transmitted microbes and neglect variability by environmental influences and external acquisition of microbes. Various environmental and landscape-level factors may have an impact on the gut-microbiota of pollinating insects, with consequences for pollinator health and fitness in agroecosystems. Still, it is not fully clear whether access to a higher vs lower flower diversity will have a significant influence on the bumble bee microbiota. Here, we tested in a semi-field experiment how strongly the bumble bee microbiota changes over time when exposed to different flower diversities within outdoor flight cages. We used commercial hives to distinguish between vertically and horizontally transmitted bacteria, respectively from the nest environment or the exposed outside environment. ResultThe sequential sampling of foraging workers over a period of 35 days indicated a temporal progression of the bumble bee microbiota when exposed to outside conditions. The microbiota became not only more diverse, but changed in composition and variability over time. We observed a major increase in relative abundance of the families Lactobacillaceae, Bifidobacteriaceae and Weeksellaceae. In contrast, major core taxa like Snodgrassella and Gilliamella declined in their relative abundance over time. The genus Lactobacillus showed a high diversity and strain specific turnover, so that only specific ASVs showed an increase over time, while others had a more erratic occurrence pattern. Exposure to different flower diversities had no significant influence on the bumble bee microbiota. ConclusionThe bumble bee microbiota showed a dynamic temporal progression with distinct compositional changes and diversification over time. The exposure of bumble bees to environmental conditions, or environmental microbes, increases dissimilarity and changes the gut-community composition compared to laboratory rearing conditions. This shows the importance of environmental influences on the temporal dynamic and progression of the bumble bee microbiota. Scope statementBumble bees (Bombus terrestris) are, next to the honey bee, commercially important pollinators and widely used to enhance crop pollination service within greenhouse environments. They host a similar, but characteristic, set of core-microbiota which are of known importance for bumble bee health. Despite this, bumble bees harbor their own specific set of symbionts, which do not occur within the honey bee and seem to be more easily influenced by colonization of environmental microbes. While experiments under controlled lab-based rearing conditions often lack the influence of environmental or landscape-level drivers, field-based observation can often not resolve the influence of a single factor. One major unresolved question is which environmental factor influences the microbiota of social pollinators by environmental microbes. Especially whether monocultures (low flower diversity) are per se rather detrimental to microbiota composition compared to more balanced and diverse pollen provisions (high flower diversity). Within this article, we investigated the influence of different flower diversities as potential drivers of the bumble bee gut-microbiota under semi-field conditions. We used outdoor cages which contained a flower diversity gradient to specifically test how a low and high diversity of flower resources could influence the bumble bee microbiota over time.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Microbial Ecology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
2
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.5%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.2%
4
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.4%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.4%
6
Insects
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
7
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
8
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
9
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
10
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
11
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.9%
12
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
14
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
15
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
17
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
18
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
20
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
21
Environmental Microbiology Reports
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
22
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
Environmental Microbiome
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
24
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
25
Current Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
26
Microbiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Environmental DNA
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
28
BMC Microbiology
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
30
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%