Back

Long-Term Outcome after Convergent Procedure for Atrial Fibrillation

Gersak, B.; Podlogar, V.; Prolic Kalinsek, T.; Jan, M.

2023-11-27 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2023.11.20.23298797
Show abstract

BackgroundThe aim of this single-center retrospective study is to evaluate the long-term outcome after convergent procedure (CP) for patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), persistent AF and long-standing persistent AF. Methods and resultsWe analyzed outcomes of patients that underwent CP from January 2009 until July 2020. 119 patients with paroxysmal AF (23.5%), persistent AF (5.9%) or long-standing persistent AF (70.6%) that attended long-term follow up were included. The outcome was assessed at 1-year after CP and at long-term follow up. At 1-year follow up rhythm and daily AF burden were assessed for patients with implantable loop recorder (61.2%). For others rhythm was assessed by clinical presentation and 12-lead ECG recording. At long-term follow up patients having sinus rhythm or unclear history of AF were monitored with 7-day ECG Holter and AF burden was determined. Long-term success was defined as freedom from AF/atrial flutter (AFL) with sinus rhythm on 12-lead ECG recording and AF/AFL burden <1% on 7-day Holter ECG. Repeat catheter ablations (RFA) prior to long-term follow up were documented. At 1-year follow up 91.4% of patients had sinus rhythm and 76.1% of patients had AF/AFL burden <1%. At long-term follow up (8.3 {+/-} 2.8 years) 65.5% of patients had sinus rhythm and 53.8% patients had AF/AFL burden <1% on 7-day holter ECG. Additional RFAs were performed in 32.8% of patients who had AF or AFL burden <1%. At long-term follow up age, body mass index and left atrial volume index were associated with increased risk of AF recurrence. ConclusionsCP resulted in high long-term probability of sinus rhythm maintenance. During long-term follow-up additional RFAs were required to maintain sinus rhythm in a substantial number of patients.

Matching journals

1
Heart Rhythm
Elsevier BV · based on 16 published papers
Top 0.1%
133× avg
2
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
#1
107× avg
3
Heart
BMJ · based on 10 published papers
#1
92× avg
4
The American Journal of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 15 published papers
Top 0.3%
48× avg
5
Circulation
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 37 published papers
Top 2%
20× avg
6
Journal of the American Heart Association
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 92 published papers
Top 4%
8.0× avg
7
Open Heart
BMJ · based on 18 published papers
Top 1.0%
28× avg
8
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Frontiers Media SA · based on 33 published papers
Top 3%
13× avg
9
International Journal of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 13 published papers
Top 0.9%
30× avg
10
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 78%
2.9%
11
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 36%
2.4%
12
Journal of Clinical Medicine
MDPI AG · based on 77 published papers
Top 7%
4.0× avg
13
European Heart Journal
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 14 published papers
Top 3%
12× avg
14
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 30 published papers
Top 3%
7.4× avg
15
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 76%
1.4%
16
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 15 published papers
Top 2%
8.8× avg
17
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 12 published papers
Top 3%
10× avg