Back

Investigating the effect of visual threat in virtual reality on perceiving postural instability onset

McIlroy, R. E.; Barnett-Cowan, M.

2023-11-17 neuroscience
10.1101/2023.11.17.567574 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSensory information processing plays a crucial role in monitoring the timing of external and internal events, including the control of balance. While previous research has investigated the role of vision in the perceived timing of postural instability onset with eyes closed and open, it is important to further explore the influence of visual context. Virtual reality offers a unique opportunity to manipulate visual information and assess its impact on balance control and the perceived timing of sensory events. Research QuestionDoes visual information, particularly visual threat presented in virtual reality, alter the perceived timing of postural instability onset? MethodsTwo temporal order judgment tasks were conducted using virtual reality to manipulate visual information. Participants were placed on a virtual skyscraper to induce visual threat. The experiments investigated the impact of visual information on the perceived onset of postural instability while manipulating the presence/absence of visual threat. ResultsWith vision available but without visual threat, the onset of a postural perturbation needed to occur 10.71-12.33 ms before a reference sound stimulus to be perceived as simultaneous. With visual threat, the onset needed to occur 4.45 ms before auditory cue onset to be perceived as simultaneous. While these delays were not significantly different from true simultaneity of perturbation and sound onset, participants were significantly more precise in their judgments when threatening visual information was present. SignificanceOur results show that visual context, particularly visual threat presented in virtual reality, may alter the perception of perturbation onset and the precision of judgments made. This has implications for understanding the role of vision in balance control and developing interventions to improve balance and prevent falls.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Human Movement Science
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.7%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.2%
3
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 12%
7.2%
5
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
7
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
8
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
9
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
10
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
11
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
12
Gait & Posture
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
13
Experimental Physiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
14
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
15
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
16
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
17
The Cerebellum
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
18
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
20
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Consciousness and Cognition
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Neuroscience of Consciousness
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
25
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.6%
26
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.5%
27
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
28
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.5%