Back

Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 induces defense responses in diverse maize inbred lines

Jaiswal, N.; Helm, M.

2023-11-17 plant biology
10.1101/2023.11.17.567553 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Many phytopathogens translocate virulence (effector) proteins into plant cells to circumvent host immune responses during infection. One such pathogen is Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000, which secretes at least twenty-nine effectors into host cells, of which a subset elicits host defense responses in crop plant species. However, it is unknown whether P. syringae pv. tomato DC3000 activates immune responses in diverse maize inbreds. Here, we screened a diverse maize germplasm collection for effector-dependent recognition of this bacterial pathogen. As a control, we infiltrated Pseudomonas syringae DC3000(D36E), a derivative of P. syringae pv. tomato DC3000 that lacks all endogenous effectors. In our evaluations, we observed a variety of responses to P. syringae pv. tomato DC3000 in maize and scored the phenotypes as either no observable response (N) or as one of three responses: weak chlorosis (WC), chlorosis (C) with minimal cell death, and hypersensitive reaction (HR)-like cell death. Of the twenty-six maize inbreds screened, 13 were scored as N, 2 as WC, 2 as C, and 9 as HR-like cell death. Importantly, no maize line responded to P. syringae DC3000(D36E), demonstrating the responses observed are likely dependent upon recognition of one or more Pseudomonas effectors. Importantly, maize inbreds that recognize P. syringae pv. tomato DC3000 accumulated detectable hydrogen peroxide as well as an increase in transcript expression of a subset of maize defense genes. Collectively, our results will likely stimulate new research aimed at identifying the cognate maize disease resistance proteins that recognize the activities of one or more bacterial effectors.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
55 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
37.1%
2
Phytopathology®
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
5
Molecular Plant Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
6
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
7
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.5%
8
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.0%
9
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
10
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.9%
12
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Plant Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.6%
15
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
16
Plant Pathology
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
17
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.9%
18
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
20
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
22
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Nature Plants
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
26
Environmental Microbiology Reports
27 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
27
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%