Back

Baseline resting EEG measures differentiate rTMS treatment responders and non-responders.

Kaewpijit, P.; Fitzgerald, P. B.; Hoy, K.; Bailey, N. W.

2023-11-17 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2023.11.16.23298445 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been increasingly used worldwide in the treatment of depression, however, we currently lack the means to reliably predict whether patients will respond to the treatment. Recent research suggests that the neurophysiological measures of beta power and correlation dimension may have predictive potential, however, studies of beta power and correlation dimension to differentiate rTMS group response in individuals with major depression are limited. MethodsFifty treatment-resistant patients with major depressive disorder were recruited. Forty-two participants underwent baseline resting EEG sessions and 5-8 weeks of rTMS treatments and 12 participants were responders to the treatment. Beta power and correlation dimension from baseline resting EEG were compared between responders and non-responders. ResultsResponders demonstrated significantly lower beta power in baseline resting EEG, however, correlation dimension did not show a significant difference between groups. LimitationsThere were a small number of responders in this study. ConclusionBaseline resting beta power may help to differentiate responders from non-responders to rTMS treatment. However, further studies are needed with larger sample sizes.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
35.6%
2
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
3
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
4
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.5%
7
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
8
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.0%
9
Journal of Psychopharmacology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
10
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
11
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.3%
12
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.0%
13
European Neuropsychopharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
14
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
15
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
16
Psychopharmacology
59 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
17
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
19
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
20
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
21
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
22
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
24
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%