Back

Extended discrete gene regulatory network model for the Arabidopsis thaliana root-hair cell fate

Castillo-Jimenez, A.; Garay-Arroyo, A.; Sanchez-Jimenez, M. d. l. P.; Garcia-Ponce, B.; Martinez-Garcia, J. C.; Alvarez-Buylla, E. R.

2023-11-17 systems biology
10.1101/2023.11.15.567304 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The differentiation of the two cell types of the root epidermis, atrichoblasts, which give rise to hair cells, and atrichoblasts, which do not develop as hair cells, is determined by a complex regulatory network of transcriptional factors and hormones that act in concert in space and time to define a characteristic pattern of rows of hair cells and non-hair cells interspersed with each other throughout the root epidermis of Arabidopsis thaliana. Previous models have defined a minimal regulatory network that recovers the Wild Type phenotype and some mutants but fails to recover most of the mutant phenotypes, thus limiting its ability to spread. In this work, we propose a diffusion-coupled regulatory genetic network or meta-Gene Regulatory Network model extended to the model previously published by our research group, to describe the patterns of organization of the epidermis of the root epidermis of Arabidopsis thaliana. This network fully or partially recovers loss-of-function mutants of the identity regulators of the epidermal cell types considered within the model. Not only that, this new extended model is able to describe in quantitative terms the distribution of trichoblasts and atrichoblasts defined at each cellular position with respect to the cortex cells so that it is possible to compare the proportions of each cell type at those positions with that reported in each of the mutants analyzed. In addition, the proposed model allows us to explore the importance of the diffusion processes that are part of the lateral inhibition mechanism underlying the network dynamics and their relative importance in determining the pattern in the Wild Type phenotype and the different mutants.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 4%
26.0%
2
Biosystems
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.4%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 7%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
6
Biomolecules
95 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
7
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
8
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
9
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
10
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
11
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
12
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
15
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
17
Plant And Cell Physiology
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
18
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
19
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
20
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
21
BioSystems
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
22
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
25
Neuroinformatics
40 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
26
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
27
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.5%
28
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.5%