Back

Quantification of water exchange across the blood-brain barrier using non-contrast MR fingerprinting

Thomson, E. L.; Powell, E.; Wheeler-Kingshott, C. A. M. G.; Parker, G. J. M.

2023-11-17 neuroscience
10.1101/2023.11.15.567199 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeA method is proposed to quantify cerebral blood volume (vb) and intravascular water residence time ({tau}b) using magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF), applied using a spoiled gradient echo sequence, without the need for contrast agent. MethodsAn in silico study optimised an acquisition protocol to maximise the sensitivity of the measurement to vb and{tau} b changes. Its accuracy in the presence of variations in T1,t, T1,b, and B1 was evaluated. The optimised protocol (scan time of 19 minutes) was then tested in a exploratory healthy volunteer study (10 volunteers, mean age 24 {+/-} 3, 6 male) at 3 T with a repeat scan taken after repositioning to allow estimation of repeatability. ResultsSimulations show that assuming literature values for T1,b and T1,t, no variation in B1, while fitting only vb and{tau} b, leads to large errors in quantification of vb and{tau} b, regardless of noise levels. However, simulations also show that matching [Formula] and{tau} b, simultaneously is feasible at clinically achievable noise levels. Across the healthy volunteers, all parameter quantifications fell within the expected literature range. In addition, the maps show good agreement between hemispheres suggesting physiologically relevant information is being extracted. Expected differences between white and grey matter T1,t (p<0.0001) and vb (p<0.0001) are observed, T1,b and{tau} b show no significant differences, p=0.4 and p=0.6 repectively. Good repeatability was seen between repeat scans: mean ICC of T1,t : 0.91, T1,b : 0.58, vb : 0.90, and v{tau}b : 0.96. ConclusionWe demonstrate that regional simultaneous quantification of vb,{tau} b, T1,b,T1,t, and B1 using MRF is feasible in vivo.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.