Back

Gender inequalities in the disruption of long-term life satisfaction trajectories during the COVID-19 pandemic and the role of time use: evidence from the 1970 British birth cohort

Moreno-Agostino, D.; Chanfreau, J.; Knowles, G.; Pelikh, A.; Das-Munshi, J.; Ploubidis, G. B.

2023-11-16 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2023.11.15.23298585 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately impacted womens mental health, although most evidence has focused on mental illbeing outcomes. Previous research suggests that gendered differences in time-use may explain this disparity, as women generally spend more time doing psychologically taxing activities than men. We investigated gender differences in the long-term trajectories of life satisfaction, how these were impacted during the pandemic, and the role of time-use differences in explaining gender inequalities. MethodsWe used data from 6766 (56.2% women) members of the 1970 British Cohort Study (BCS70), a nationally representative birth cohort of people born in Great Britain in 1970, who were alive and residing in the UK between May 2020 and March 2021. Life satisfaction was prospectively assessed between the ages of 26 (1996) and 51 (2021) using a single question with responses ranging from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest). We analysed life satisfaction trajectories using piecewise latent growth curve models and investigated whether gender differences in the change in the life satisfaction trajectories with the pandemic were explained by self-reported time spent doing different paid and unpaid activities. FindingsWomen had consistently higher life satisfaction than men prior to the pandemic ({Delta}intercept,unadjusted=0.213 [95% CI: 0.087, 0.340], p=.001) and experienced a more accelerated decline with the pandemic onset ({Delta}quad2,unadjusted=-0.018 [-0.026, -0.011], p<.001). Time-use differences did not account for the more accelerated decrease in womens life satisfaction levels with the pandemic ({Delta}quad2,adjusted=-0.016 [-0.031, -0.001], p=.035). InterpretationOur study shows pronounced gender inequalities in the impact of the pandemic on the long-term life satisfaction trajectories of adults in their 50s, with women losing their historical advantage over men. Self-reported time-use differences did not account for these inequalities, suggesting that they could be linked to other factors including the mental load (invisible, unrecognised labour disproportionately undertook by women) or the menopausal transition.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.7%
2
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.3%
3
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
4
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.3%
7
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
8
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.7%
9
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
10
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
11
Psychoneuroendocrinology
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
12
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.2%
14
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
15
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 68%
1.1%
17
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
18
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
20
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
21
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
24
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
27
International Journal of Public Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
28
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%