Back

Whose quality of life is it anyway? Evaluation of quality of life tools for children with complex needs accessing specialist leisure provision.

Astill, F.; Collins, B.; McGrath, N.; Kemp, A.; Hurt, L.; Maguire, S.

2023-12-27 pediatrics
10.1101/2023.11.15.23298564 medRxiv
Show abstract

Studies of quality of life (QoL) routinely exclude children with complex needs. These children struggle to access leisure activities, particularly those with severe communication needs or challenging behaviour. Sparkle provides specialised leisure services to children and young people (0-17 years) with complex needs in South Wales, UK. We aimed to evaluate previously validated tools to measure QoL with this population. Three tools were assessed over a 6-year period - PedsQL, KINDLR and QI-Disability. PedsQL (41) and KINDLR (10) were attempted by the children attending the clubs (5-17 years old), and QI-Disability by caregivers (96). The majority of child participants had a neurodevelopmental diagnosis, a proportion of whom were non-verbal. Neither KINDLR nor PedsQL were appropriate for the population, with children unable to understand the questions and answers. The QI-Disability scores showed a statistically significant improvement in parents estimate of their childs positive emotions, but results were severely limited by drop off. Existing validated QoL tools cannot be meaningfully used by children with complex needs. While the caregiver tool showed some benefit of specialist leisure provision, it is recognised that caregivers may perceive a childs QoL differently to the child themselves, and caregivers clearly found repeat measurements onerous.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.2%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 1%
14.6%
3
Archives of Disease in Childhood
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.6%
5
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
6
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.8%
8
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
9
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
10
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
11
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
12
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
13
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
14
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
15
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
16
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
Pediatric Pulmonology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
18
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
19
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
20
International Journal of Public Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
21
Ear & Hearing
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%