Whose quality of life is it anyway? Evaluation of quality of life tools for children with complex needs accessing specialist leisure provision.
Astill, F.; Collins, B.; McGrath, N.; Kemp, A.; Hurt, L.; Maguire, S.
Show abstract
Studies of quality of life (QoL) routinely exclude children with complex needs. These children struggle to access leisure activities, particularly those with severe communication needs or challenging behaviour. Sparkle provides specialised leisure services to children and young people (0-17 years) with complex needs in South Wales, UK. We aimed to evaluate previously validated tools to measure QoL with this population. Three tools were assessed over a 6-year period - PedsQL, KINDLR and QI-Disability. PedsQL (41) and KINDLR (10) were attempted by the children attending the clubs (5-17 years old), and QI-Disability by caregivers (96). The majority of child participants had a neurodevelopmental diagnosis, a proportion of whom were non-verbal. Neither KINDLR nor PedsQL were appropriate for the population, with children unable to understand the questions and answers. The QI-Disability scores showed a statistically significant improvement in parents estimate of their childs positive emotions, but results were severely limited by drop off. Existing validated QoL tools cannot be meaningfully used by children with complex needs. While the caregiver tool showed some benefit of specialist leisure provision, it is recognised that caregivers may perceive a childs QoL differently to the child themselves, and caregivers clearly found repeat measurements onerous.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- How young people experienced Long COVID services: a qualitative analysis 93%
- Healthcare professionals' perspectives on the challenges faced by parents of children with autism and recommendations to address them: A qualitative study 92%
- Early activity and impact of a neighbourhood multidisciplinary team that integrates health, and social support for underserved children and young people in Birmingham, UK: an observational study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors influencing wellbeing in young people during COVID-19: A survey with 6291 young people in Wales 94%
- Developing a context-relevant psychosocial stimulation intervention to promote cognitive development of children with severe acute malnutrition in Mwanza, Tanzania 94%
- To what extent does self-reported physical activity impact children’s wellbeing and mental health? Insights from School-Aged Children in Wales 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Parent-reported assessment scores reflect ASD severity in 2- to 7- year-old children 90%
- Language comprehension developmental milestones in typically developing children assessed by the new Language Phenotype Assessment (LPA) 87%
- Validity and wear compliance of wrist-wearable activity trackers in free-living schoolchildren: validation study 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- ‘Admissions to paediatric medical wards with a primary mental health diagnosis: a systematic review of the literature’ 90%
- AI-Simulated Clinical Consultations: Assessing the Potential of ChatGPT to Support Medical Training 88%
- Longitudinal effect of gestational age on the developmental trajectory of social competence difficulties from early childhood to mid-adolescence: Evidence from the UK Millennium Cohort 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation on the Effectiveness on the Implementation of WHO-CST Programme in Hong Kong: A RCT Protocol 93%
- Impact of COVID-19 restrictions on pre-school children’s eating, activity and sleep behaviours: a qualitative study 92%
- Common Factors in Serious Case Reviews of Child Maltreatment where there is a Medical Cause of Death: Qualitative Thematic Analysis 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.