Back

Reproducible Neuronal Components found using Group Independent Component Analysis in Resting State Electroencephalographic Data

Ochoa-Gomez, J. F.; Mantilla Ramos, Y. J.; Henao Isaza, V.; Tobon, C. A.; Lopera, F.; Aguillon, D.; Suarez Revelo, J. X.

2023-11-16 neuroscience
10.1101/2023.11.14.566952 bioRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveEvaluate the reliability of neural components obtained from the appli-cation of the group ICA (gICA) methodology to resting-state EEG datasets acquired from multiple sites. MethodsFive databases from three sites, covering a total of 292 healthy subjects, were analyzed. Each dataset was segmented into groups of 15 subjects, for a total of 19 groups. Data were pre-processed using an automatic pipeline leveraging robust average referencing, wavelet-ICA and automatic rejection of epochs. On each group, stable gICA decompositions were calculated using the ICASSO methodology through a range of orders of decompositions. Each order was characterized by reliability and neuralness metrics, which were evaluated to select a single order of decomposition. Finally, using the decompositions of the selected order, a clustering analysis was performed to find the common components across the 19 groups. Each cluster was characterized by the mean scalp map, its dipole generator with its localization in Talairach coordinates, the spectral behavior of the associated time-series of the components, the assigned ICLabel class and metrics that reflected their reproducibility. ResultsLower order of decompositions benefits the gICA methodology. At this, using an order of ten, the number of reproducible components with high neuronal information tends to be around nine. Of these, the bilateral motor, frontal medial, and occipital neuronal components were the most reproducible across the different datasets, appearing in more than 89% of the 19 groups evaluated. ConclusionWe developed a workflow that allows finding reproducible spatial filters between different data sets. This contributes to the improvement of the spatial resolution of the EEG as a brain mapping technique.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
18.9%
2
Brain Topography
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.1%
3
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
122 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.1%
4
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.9%
5
Neuroinformatics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
6
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
8
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
9
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
10
Brain Connectivity
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
11
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.4%
12
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
41 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
13
Clinical Neurophysiology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.2%
14
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.0%
15
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
16
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.8%
17
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
18
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
19
Psychophysiology
77 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
20
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
21
Brain and Behavior
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
22
Brain Sciences
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
24
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%