DeepMRG: a multi-label deep learning classifier forpredicting bacterial metal resistance genes
Emon, M. I.; Zhang, L.
Show abstract
The widespread misuse of antibiotics has escalated antibiotic resistance into a critical global public health concern. Beyond antibiotics, metals function as antibacterial agents. Metal resistance genes (MRGs) enable bacteria to tolerate metal-based antibacterials and may also foster antibiotic resistance within bacterial communities through co-selection. Thus, predicting bacterial MRGs is vital for elucidating their involvement in antibiotic resistance and metal tolerance mechanisms. The "best hit" approach is mainly utilized to identify and annotate MRGs. This method is sensitive to cutoff values and produces a high false negative rate. Other than the best hit approach, only a few antimicrobial resistance (AMR) detection tools exist for predicting MRGs. However, these tools lack comprehensive annotation for MRGs conferring resistance to multiple metals. To address such limitations, we introduce DeepMRG, a deep learning-based multi-label classifier, to predict bacterial MRGs. Because a bacterial MRG can confer resistance to multiple metals, DeepMRG is designed as a multi-label classifier capable of predicting multiple metal labels associated with an MRG. It leverages bit score-based similarity distribution of sequences with experimentally verified MRGs. To ensure unbiased model evaluation, we employed a clustering method to partition our dataset into six subsets, five for cross-validation and one for testing, with non-homologous sequences, mitigating the impact of sequence homology. DeepMRG consistently achieved high overall F1-scores and significantly reduced false negative rates across a wide range of datasets. It can be used to predict bacterial MRGs in metagenomic or isolate assemblies. The web server of DeepMRG can be accessed at https://deepmrg.cs.vt.edu/deepmrg and the source code is available at https://github.com/muhit-emon/DeepMRG under the MIT license.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.