Prosthetic Visual Acuity with the PRIMA System in Patients with Atrophic Age-related Macular Degeneration at 4 years follow-up
MUQIT, M. M.; LE MER, Y.; OLMOS DE KOO, L. C.; HOLZ, F. G.; SAHEL, J. A.; Palanker, D.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy and safety of the PRIMA subretinal neurostimulation system 48-months post-implantation for improving visual acuity (VA) in patients with geographic atrophy (GA) due to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) at 48-months post-implantation. DesignFirst-in-human clinical trial of the PRIMA subretinal prosthesis in patients with atrophic AMD, measuring best-corrected ETDRS VA (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03333954). SubjectsFive patients with GA, no foveal light perception and VA of logMAR 1.3 to 1.7 in their worse-seeing "study" eye. MethodsIn patients implanted with a subretinal photovoltaic neurostimulation array containing 378 pixels of 100 m in size, the VA was measured with and without the PRIMA system using ETDRS charts at 1 meter. The systems external components: augmented reality glasses and pocket computer, provide image processing capabilities, including zoom. Main Outcome MeasuresVA using ETDRS charts with and without the system. Light sensitivity in the central visual field, as measured by Octopus perimetry. Anatomical outcomes demonstrated by fundus photography and optical coherence tomography up to 48-months post- implantation. ResultsAll five subjects met the primary endpoint of light perception elicited by the implant in the scotoma area. In one patient the implant was incorrectly inserted into the choroid. One subject died 18-months post-implantation due to study-unrelated reason. ETDRS VA results for the remaining three subjects are reported herein. Without zoom, VA closely matched the pixel size of the implant: 1.17 {+/-} 0.13 pixels, corresponding to mean logMAR 1.39, or Snellen 20/500, ranging from 20/438 to 20/565. Using zoom at 48 months, subjects improved their VA by 32 ETDRS letters versus baseline (SE 5.1) 95% CI[13.4,49.9], p<0.0001. Natural peripheral visual function in the treated eye did not decline after surgery compared to the fellow eye (p=0.08) during the 48 months follow-up period. ConclusionsSubretinal implantation of PRIMA in subjects with GA suffering from profound vision loss due to AMD is feasible and well tolerated, with no reduction of natural peripheral vision up to 48-months. Using prosthetic central vision through photovoltaic neurostimulation, patients reliably recognized letters and sequences of letters,and with zoom it provided a clinically meaningful improvement in VA of up to eight ETDRS lines.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Retinal implantation of electronic vision prostheses to treat retinitis pigmentosa: A systematic review 96%
- Relating Standardized Automated Perimetry Performed with Stimulus Sizes III and V in Eyes With Field Loss due to Glaucoma and NAION 95%
- Reliability of retinal pathology quantification in age-related macular degeneration: Implications for clinical trials and machine learning applications 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated Expert-level Scleral Spur Detection and Quantitative Biometric Analysis on the ANTERION Anterior Segment OCT System 95%
- Macula structural and vascular differences in glaucoma eyes with and without high axial myopia 95%
- Risk Model for Intraoperative Complication during Cataract Surgery Based on Data from 900,000 Eyes – Previous Intravitreal Injection is a Risk Factor 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.