Back

Acetylcholine esterase of Drosophila melanogaster: a laboratory model to explore applications of insecticide susceptibility gene drives

Hernandes, N.; Qi, M. X.; Bhide, S.; Brown, C.; Camm, B. J.; Baxter, S. W.; Robin, C.

2023-11-14 genetics
10.1101/2023.11.10.566664 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BACKGROUNDOne of the proposed applications of gene drives has been to revert pesticide resistant mutations back to the ancestral susceptible state. Insecticides that have become ineffective because of the rise of resistance could have reinvigorated utility and be used to suppress pest populations again, perhaps at lower application doses. RESULTSWe have created a laboratory model for susceptibility gene drives that replaces field-selected resistant variants of the acetylcholine esterase (Ace) locus of Drosophila melanogaster with ancestral susceptible variants. We constructed a CRISPR/Cas9 homing drive and found that homing occurred in many genetic backgrounds with varying efficiencies. While the drive itself could not be homozygosed, it converted resistant alleles into susceptible ones and produced recessive lethal alleles that could suppress populations. Our studies provided evidence for two distinct classes of Gene Drive Resistance (GDR): rather than being mediated by the conventional Non-Homologous End-joining (NHEJ) pathway, one seemed to involve short homologous repair and the other was defined by genetic background. Additionally, we used simulations to explore a distinct application of susceptibility drives; the use of chemicals to prevent the spread of synthetic gene drives into protected areas. CONCLUSIONSInsecticide susceptibility gene drives could be useful tools to control pest insects however problems associated with particularities of the target loci and GDR will need to be overcome for them to be effective. Furthermore, realistic patterns of pest dispersal and high insecticide exposure rates would be required if susceptibility were to be useful as a safety-switch to prevent the unwanted spread of gene drives.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Pest Management Science
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
45.9%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
11.5%
50% of probability mass above
3
Insects
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
4
Parasites & Vectors
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.4%
5
Journal of Medical Entomology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.0%
7
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
8
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
9
Journal of Economic Entomology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
10
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
11
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
12
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
13
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
14
Insect Molecular Biology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
15
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
16
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
17
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.7%
18
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
19
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
20
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.5%
21
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%