Back

Accurate identification of Helicoverpa armigera / Helicoverpa zea hybrids using genome admixture analysis: implications for genomic surveillance

Trujillo, D.; Mastrangelo, T.; Estevez de Jensen, C.; Rodrigues Verle, J. C.; Lawrie, R. D.; Massey, S. E.

2023-11-05 genomics
10.1101/2023.11.03.565557 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Helicoverpa armigera, the cotton bollworm moth, is one of the worlds most important crop pests, and is spreading throughout the New World from its original range in the Old World. In Brazil, invasive H.armigera has been reported to hybridize with local populations of Helicoverpa zea. The correct identification of H.armigera-H.zea hybrids is important in understanding the origin, spread and future outlook for New World regions that are affected by outbreaks, given that hybridization can potentially facilitate H.zea pesticide resistance and host plant range via introgression of H.armigera genes. Here, we present a genome admixture analysis of high quality genome sequences generated from two H.armigera-H.zea F1 hybrids generated in two different labs. Our admixture pipeline predicts 48.8 % H.armigera for both F1 hybrids, confirming its accuracy. Genome sequences from five H.zea and one H.armigera that were generated as part of the study show no evidence of hybridization. Interestingly, we show that four H.zea genomes generated from a previous study are predicted to possess a proportion of H.armigera genetic material. Using unsupervised clustering to identify non-hybridized H.armigera and H.zea genomes, 8511 ancestry informative markers (AIMs) were identified. Their relative frequencies are consistent with a minor H.armigera component in the four genomes, however its origin remains to be established. We show that the size and quality of genomic reference datasets are critical for accurate hybridization prediction. Consequently, we discuss potential pitfalls in genome admixture analysis of H.armigera-H.zea hybrids, and suggest measures that will improve such analyses.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.