Back

Simplified post-assembly plasmid library amplification for increased transformation yields in E. coli and S. cerevisiae

Fryer, T.; Wolff, D. S.; Overath, M. D.; Schaefer, E.; Laustsen, A. H.; Jenkins, T. P.; Andersen, C.

2023-11-02 synthetic biology
10.1101/2023.11.02.565362 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Many biological disciplines rely upon the transformation of host cells with heterologous DNA, the limited efficiency of which can significantly hinder a researchers work. Directed evolution in particular typically requires the screening of large (thousand-billion member) libraries to identify sequences of interest, and the creation of these libraries at large enough scales to overcome transformation inefficiencies is a cost-and time-intensive process. We simplify this process by using Rolling Circle Amplification (RCA) to amplify in vitro plasmid DNA assembly reactions, followed by facile resolution of the concatomeric products to monomers through treatment with specific endonucleases and subsequent efficient transformation of the linear DNA products into host cells for in vivo circularisation. We demonstrate that use of a nicking endonuclease to generate homologous single-stranded ends increases the efficiency of E. coli chemical transformation versus both linear DNA with double-stranded homologous ends, and circular golden-gate assembly products, whilst use of a restriction endonuclease to generate linear DNA with double-stranded homologous ends increases the efficiency of chemical and electrotransformation of S. cerevisiae. Importantly, we also optimise the process such that both RCA and endonuclease treatment occur efficiently in the same buffer, streamlining the workflow and reducing product loss through purification steps. We expect our approach to have utility beyond directed evolution in E. coli and S. cerevisiae, to areas such as genome engineering and the manipulation of alternative organisms with even poorer transformation efficiencies.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.