Back

Intra-breath oscillometry detects ventilation inhomogeneity in Cystic Fibrosis children

Blake, T. L.; Robinson, P.; Deery, M.; Wainwright, C.; Hantos, Z.; Sly, P. D.

2023-11-04 respiratory medicine
10.1101/2023.11.02.23297971 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundVentilation inhomogeneity (VI) is measured in patients with Cystic Fibrosis (CF) by lung clearance index (LCI) using the Multiple Breath Washout (MBW). In young children, feasibility is often low within busy clinical settings. Intra-breath oscillometry (IB-OSC) measures respiratory system reactance (Xrs), which is determined by the same physiological principles. Given the high feasibility of IB-OSC in young children (>80%), we aimed to explore whether Xrs variables reflected VI as measured by LCI. MethodsPaired measurements of IB-OSC (TremoFLO C-100, 10Hz signal) and Nitrogen (N2) MBW (Exhalyzer D) were performed in 97 children with CF. Abnormal LCI was defined as [&ge;]7.1. IB-OSC Xrs variables at end-expiration (XeE), end-inspiration (XeI), volume-dependence of Xrs ({Delta}X) and {Delta}X corrected for tidal volume ({Delta}X/VT) were compared between those with normal and abnormal LCI. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to identify cut-off values to detect abnormal LCI. Results115 acceptable paired IB-OSC and MBW measurements were achieved by 85 children (male 61%, median age 7.8yrs [25th-75th% 5.8-11.9]). 52 (45%) measurements of LCI were abnormal. All Xrs variables where significantly decreased (more negative) in children with abnormal LCI compared to normal (XeE -2.98v-0.81; XeI -2.10v-1.00; {Delta}X -0.25v0.12; {Delta}X/VT -0.54v0.22; all p<0.001). Cut-off values for {Delta}X and {Delta}X/VT provided the best sensitivity and specificity for detecting abnormal LCI. ConclusionThese results suggest that novel IB-OSC variables can detect abnormal VI as measured by N2 MBW-LCI. This technique may allow us to detect and monitor early changes to lung function in busy CF clinics more easily.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.