Back

Prevalence of TEM and SHV Genes in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from different Clinical specimens in Khartoum, Sudan

Hussein, S.; Salih, M.; ADLAN, H.; Abdalla, A. E.

2023-11-04 epidemiology
10.1101/2023.11.02.23297846
Show abstract

ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of ESBL producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from different clinical specimens gathered from different clinics in Khartoum State. Settings and DesignThis is a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted in Khartoum State during a period from February to May 2018. Methods and MaterialsKlebsiella pneumoniae isolated from patients attending to health-care settings with different infections, which was re-identiGied by conventional methods and screened for ESBL production by modiGied Kirby-Bauers method. The TEM and SHV genes were detected by PCR. ResultsOut of 100 K. pneumoniae isolates, 85% (85/100) were ESBL producing strains. The highest prevalence of ESBL production was in blood 100% (6/6) as well as stool 100% (4/4) followed by sputum 91% (21/23), wound 85% (12/14) and urine 82%(40\49) samples, while the lowest was noted in CSF 50% (2/4). The isolated K. pneumoniae showed high resistance to Ceftazidime 85% followed by Cefotaxime and Cefpodoxime 80% for each and 73% for Aztreonam. Furthermore, we found that 88% of isolates were resistant to Colistin and 33% were resistant to Meropenem. TEM and SHV genes were detected in 9.4% (8/85) and 1.2% (1/85) of ESBL producing strains, respectively. However, SHV was also detected in 6.7% (1/15) of non-ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae. ConclusionsA high prevalence of ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae was detected in this study Which is 85%. TEM and SHV genes were found in some strains of ESBL producing K. pneumoniae. The Gindings of this study alarm the physicians to take ESBL producing strains of K. pneumoniae under consideration before making treatment decisions.

Matching journals

The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 37%
13.3%
2
Journal of Medical Virology
based on 95 papers
Top 1%
5.6%
3
BMC Infectious Diseases
based on 110 papers
Top 0.8%
4.9%
4
PLOS Global Public Health
based on 287 papers
Top 10%
3.1%
5
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
based on 22 papers
Top 0.6%
3.0%
6
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
based on 166 papers
Top 5%
3.0%
7
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
based on 50 papers
Top 3%
3.0%
8
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
based on 19 papers
Top 0.3%
3.0%
9
Health Science Reports
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
2.6%
10
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 59%
2.6%
11
Epidemiology and Infection
based on 80 papers
Top 3%
2.6%
12
Clinical Infectious Diseases
based on 219 papers
Top 10%
2.6%
13
Journal of Infection
based on 64 papers
Top 2%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
14
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 115 papers
Top 6%
2.4%
15
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 9%
1.9%
16
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
based on 10 papers
Top 0.4%
1.7%
17
Cureus
based on 64 papers
Top 10%
1.7%
18
Microbiology Spectrum
based on 86 papers
Top 1%
1.7%
19
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
based on 77 papers
Top 3%
1.7%
20
Journal of Global Health
based on 18 papers
Top 1%
1.4%
21
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
based on 124 papers
Top 7%
1.4%
22
Emerging Infectious Diseases
based on 84 papers
Top 8%
1.4%
23
Microorganisms
based on 21 papers
Top 0.2%
1.4%
24
mSystems
based on 16 papers
Top 1%
1.3%
25
IJID Regions
based on 10 papers
Top 0.2%
1.3%
26
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
based on 16 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Diagnostics
based on 36 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
28
Eurosurveillance
based on 77 papers
Top 7%
0.8%
29
Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
based on 10 papers
Top 1%
0.8%
30
Frontiers in Microbiology
based on 36 papers
Top 4%
0.7%