Back

DystoGen Compendium: A comprehensive resource of ACMG annotated movement disorder associated genetic variants

Saikia, B. J.; Gaharwar, U.; Poojary, M.; Mhaske, A.; Paul, S.; Kumar, M.; Pandhare, K.; Sharma, S.; Rophina, M.; Rastogi, S.; Karal, M.; Scaria, V.; BK, B.

2023-11-02 bioinformatics
10.1101/2023.10.31.564874 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeIn recent years, the advent of high throughput sequencing techniques has led to the identification of a number of genetic variants across different genes that are associated with movement disorders. However, the under-appreciation of the variant spectrum in movement disorders and the lack of consolidated and systematic evidence-based annotation of these variants has long undermined the true potential of genomic approaches to expedite precision medicine. MethodsWe manually curated the genetic variants from a panel of 118 genes that have been associated with monogenic causes of movement disorders and systematically annotated them according to ACMG & AMP (American College of Medical Genetics and the Association of Molecular Pathologists) guidelines. ResultsData integration after systematic classification of variants according to ACMG & AMP guidelines showed 5118 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants accounting for 18.03% of the total unique variants being annotated. This data and annotations are available in a comprehensive online compendium DystoGen. ConclusionTo the best of our knowledge, this is the most comprehensive compendium of genetic variants in movement disorders annotated as per the ACMG & AMP guidelines for pathogenicity. The compendium indexes 28377 variants along with a wide array of information including the geographical origin of the variant, global distribution, and population allele frequency. The resource has been made available in the URL https://clingen.igib.res.in/dystogen/.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.