Back

A polygenic risk score identifies undiagnosed cases of diabetes

German, C.; Ashenhurst, J.; Wang, W.; 23andMe Research Team, ; Granka, J. M.; Koelsch, B. L.; Abul-Husn, N. S.; Aslibekyan, S.; Auton, A.; Tung, J.; Shringarpure, S. S.; Holmes, M. V.

2023-11-01 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2023.10.31.23297847 medRxiv
Show abstract

ImportanceTwenty-three percent of 37.3M adults in the USA with diabetes are estimated to be undiagnosed, leading to potentially avoidable sequelae and morbidity. ObjectiveTo explore the utility of a polygenic risk score (PRS) at identifying individuals with undiagnosed diabetes and prediabetes. Design, Setting and ParticipantsIndividuals without doctor-diagnosed diabetes at study baseline in the UK Biobank (UKB) with HbA1c and BMI measurements. Participants were restricted to white individuals to use an ancestry-appropriate PRS. Undiagnosed diabetes and prediabetes were defined using HbA1c ([&ge;]6.5% and [&ge;]5.7 - <6.5%, respectively). ExposuresA diabetes PRS comprising 13,863 SNPs derived from the 23andMe Research Cohort, and measured BMI among UKB participants. ResultsOf 412,439 individuals self-reporting an absence of diagnosed diabetes and who had BMI and HbA1c measurements at baseline, 2,934 (0.7%) had undiagnosed diabetes, representing 11.9% of all (diagnosed and undiagnosed) diabetes. Nearly half (1,362, 46%) of undiagnosed diabetes cases were among individuals in the top 25% of the PRS distribution. Overweight individuals (BMI [&ge;]25 - <30 kg/m2) who were in the top 12.5% of the PRS distribution had a similar frequency of undiagnosed diabetes (0.8-1.6% frequency) as individuals with obesity (BMI [&ge;]30kg/m2) in the lowest 12.5% of the PRS distribution (0.7-1.7% frequency). Combining overweight and obesity with the PRS identified nearly all cases of undiagnosed diabetes: individuals with a BMI [&ge;]25 kg/m2 (66% of the study population) or those in the top 54-69% of the PRS identified 98-99% of undiagnosed cases. Of the 199 undiagnosed diabetes cases occurring among individuals with a normal BMI (<25kg/m2), two-thirds were among individuals in the top 50% of the PRS. Prediabetes was common (14%), with measured BMI and PRS providing additive risk. Among those in the top 12.5% PRS with BMI [&ge;]35kg/m2, 6.3% developed incident diabetes over 4 years follow-up, as compared to 0% among the bottom 12.5% PRS with BMI<25kg/m2. ConclusionsA diabetes PRS is informative at identifying undiagnosed cases. PRS may have broader utility in detecting individuals with asymptomatic disease. Key PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSDoes a polygenic risk score (PRS) have utility in identifying individuals with undiagnosed type 2 diabetes (T2D)? FindingsIn this analysis of 412,439 individuals without doctor-diagnosed diabetes, a T2D PRS performed additively to body mass index (BMI) at identifying individuals with undiagnosed diabetes. Selecting individuals on the basis of overweight/obesity or a T2D PRS identified almost all cases of undiagnosed diabetes. The majority of undiagnosed diabetes cases among individuals with normal weight occurred among those at elevated polygenic risk. MeaningA T2D PRS identifies cases of undiagnosed diabetes among individuals with and without overweight or obesity.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Diabetologia
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.5%
2
Diabetes Care
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.1%
3
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
Diabetes
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.8%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.7%
6
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
7
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.1%
8
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
9
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.8%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.8%
12
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
13
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
14
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
15
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
16
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.3%
17
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
18
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Genetics in Medicine Open
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
20
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
21
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
22
Archives of Disease in Childhood
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
23
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
24
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%