The implications of using maternity care deserts to measure progress in access to obstetric care: A mixed-integer optimization analysis
Meredith, M.; Steimle, L. N.; Radke, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundLack of access to risk-appropriate maternity services, particularly for rural residents, is thought to be a leading contributor to disparities in maternal morbidity and mortality. There are several existing measures of access to obstetric care in the literature and popular media. In this study, we explored how current measures of obstetric access inform the number and location of additional obstetric care facilities required to improve access. MethodsWe formulated two facility location optimization models to determine the number of new facilities required to minimize the number of reproductive-aged women who lack access to obstetric care. We define regions with a lack of access as either maternity care deserts, designated by the March of Dimes to be counties with no obstetric care facility or obstetric providers, or regions further than 50 miles from critical care obstetric (CCO) services. We gathered information on hospitals with obstetric services from Georgia Department of Public Health public reports and estimated the female reproductive-age population by census block group using the American Community Survey. ResultsOut of the 1,910,308 reproductive-aged women who live in Georgia, 104,158 (5.5%) live in maternity care deserts, 150,563 (7.9%) reproductive-aged women live further than 50 miles from CCO services, and 38,202 (2.0%) live in both maternity care desert and further than 50 miles from CCO services. Our optimization analysis suggests that at least 56 new obstetric care facilities (a 67% increase) would be required to eliminate maternity care deserts in Georgia. However, and the expansion of 8 facilities would ensure all women in Georgia live within 50 miles of CCO services. ConclusionsCurrent measures of access to obstetric care may not be sufficient for evaluating access and planning action toward improvements. In a state like Georgia with a large number of small counties, eliminating maternity care deserts would require a prohibitively large number of new obstetric care facilities. This work suggests that additional measures and tools are needed to estimate the number and type of obstetric care facilities that best match practical resources to meet obstetric care needs.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The COVID-19 health equity twindemic: Statewide epidemiologic trends of SARS-CoV-2 outcomes among racial minorities and in rural America 92%
- Identification and Mitigation of High-Risk Pregnancy with the Community Maternal Danger Score Mobile Application in Gboko, Nigeria 92%
- Cost savings in male circumcision post-operative care continuum in rural and urban South Africa: Evidence on the importance of initial counselling and daily SMS 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evolving Patterns of COVID-19 Mortality in US Counties: A Longitudinal Study of Healthcare, Socioeconomic, and Vaccination Associations 92%
- Examining National Health Insurance Fund Members’ preferences and trade-offs for the attributes of contracted outpatient facilities in Kenya: a discrete choice experiment 90%
- Cost-Effectiveness of a Pediatric Operating Room Installation in Sub-Saharan Africa 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Forecasting local surges in COVID-19 hospitalizations through adaptive decision tree classifiers 90%
- A novel decision modeling framework for health policy analyses when outcomes are influenced by social and disease processes 89%
- Pricing Treatments Cost-Effectively When They Have Multiple Indications: Not Just a Simple Threshold Analysis 89%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Modelling vaccination capacity at mass vaccination hubs and general practice clinics 91%
- Urban-Rural Disparities in Spatio-Temporal Accessibility of Pharmacy Care: A Case Study of Vermont, USA 91%
- Measurement Matters: Changing Penalty Calculations under the Hospital Acquired Condition Reduction Program (HACRP) Cost Hospitals Millions 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.