Back

Comparison of nasopharyngeal swab vs. lower respiratory tract specimen PCR for the diagnosis of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia

Chew, R.; Tozer, S.; Ulett, K.; Paterson, D.; Whiley, D.; Sloots, T.; Fielding, D.; Zappala, C.; Bashirzadeh, F.; Hundloe, J.; Bletchley, C.; Woods, M.

2023-10-30 respiratory medicine
10.1101/2023.10.28.23297710 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and objectiveDiagnosis of P. jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) is by PCR on lower respiratory tract specimens, the collection of which is not always well-tolerated and requires trained staff and costly equipment not usually available in low-resource settings. We aimed to evaluate P. jirovecii PCR performed on nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) as a diagnostic test for PJP, as well as the impact of specimen quality on test performance. MethodsPatients with clinically-suspected PJP in public hospitals in Queensland, Australia, who had quantitative P. jirovecii PCR performed on lower respiratory tract specimens from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2016, and also had NPS collected by healthcare staff within seven days of lower respiratory tract specimen collection were included in this retrospective cohort study. Quantitative P. jirovecii PCR was performed, and sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated. Specimen quality was assessed by quantifying endogenous retrovirus 3 (ERV3) loads, with higher values indicating better specimen quality. ResultsOne hundred and eleven patients were included. The sensitivity of NPS P. jirovecii PCR was 0.66 and specificity was 1.0. The positive predictive value was 1.0 and the negative predictive value was 0.63. Median ERV3 loads in lower respiratory tract specimens and NPS were not significantly different in true positive vs. true negative patients, but was significantly higher in true positives vs. false negatives (7.55x102 vs. 3.67x102; P=0.05). ConclusionP. jirovecii PCR on NPS was highly specific but poorly sensitive. Proper specimen collection is essential to ensure adequate quality and prevent misclassification. Summary at a GlanceUsing nasopharyngeal swabs instead of lower respiratory tract specimens for PCR to diagnose P. jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) may be better tolerated and improve diagnostic accessibility. In this two-year retrospective cohort study of patients with clinically-suspected PJP from Queensland, Australia, P. jirovecii PCR on NPS had high specificity but low sensitivity.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Medical Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.6%
2
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
3
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
4
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.6%
6
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
8
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
10
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.6%
11
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
13
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
14
Infection
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
15
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
17
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
18
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
20
Virology Journal
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
21
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
22
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
23
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
24
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
25
Epidemiology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
26
BMC Microbiology
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
The American Journal of Pathology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
28
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
29
Life
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
30
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%