Back

Multiplicative frequency and angular speckle reduction in ultrasound imaging

Li, Y.; Toyonaga, N.; Jiang, J.; Cable, A.; Chu, S.

2023-10-31 bioengineering
10.1101/2023.10.26.564267 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Speckle is the major artifact in ultrasound imaging, and it is well-known that speckle can be reduced by compounding (averaging) images taken either at different frequencies or from different angles. By averaging images of a phantom taken over a frequency range [Formula] and a 90{degrees} span of angles, the combined speckle reduction is demonstrated to be ~ 9x compared to non-compounded images, while the reduction with frequency or angle averaging resulted in reductions of ~ 3x individually. The rf input to the transducer is altered to vary the sound frequency and the phantom is rotated with respect to the transducer to obtain different imaging angles. Numerical simulations of sound scattered by randomly distributed point scatterers showed quantitative agreement with the experiment. Using a commercial system, a 6x reduction in speckle is demonstrated imaging a human wrist. A robot arm is used to move the transducer along a circular path to acquire images at 9 angles separated by 10{degrees}. The commercial system does not allow direct control of the input to the transducer, so the broadband signal detected is Fourier filtered to obtain images at different frequencies with ~ 2x reduced frequency range. Images taken at different angles contain distortions from speed of sound variations and pressure induced by the probe. Two forms of non-rigid image registration are applied to correct for the distortions and create a higher resolution composite image. A design for achieving ~10x speckle reduction with essentially no loss in imaging speed is described.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.7%
2
Photoacoustics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
3
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
4
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.3%
6
Optics Letters
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.4%
8
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
9
Physics in Medicine & Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
10
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
11
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
12
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
13
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
14
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.1%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.1%
16
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
17
IEEE Access
35 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
18
Journal of Biomedical Optics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
19
Optics Express
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
20
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
21
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
22
Optica
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
23
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%