Biomimetic computations improve neural network robustness
Evanson, L.; Lavrov, M.; Kharitonov, I.; Lu, S.; Kozlov, A.
Show abstract
Object recognition by natural and artificial sensory systems requires a combination of selectivity and invariance. Both natural and artificial neural networks achieve selectivity and invariance by propagating sensory information though layers of neurons organised in a functional hierarchy. Both employ computational units performing AND-like operations for selectivity and OR-like operations for invariance. However, while biological neurons are intrinsically capable of switching between these operations, their artificial counterparts are hard-wired to perform only one of them. We wanted to test whether the flexible mapping between neurons and computations observed in biological neural networks is compatible with, or perhaps even useful to, artificial neural networks. To answer this question, we have developed a deep learning layer in which both selectivity and invariance operations can be performed by the same neurons. As with biological neurons, the choice of which operation an artificial neuron performs on a given input can be governed by the input strength. This flexible layer successfully outputs a combination of the two operations and, surprisingly, confers additional robustness to adversarial examples, which are inputs deliberately crafted to promote misclassification. The flexible mapping also improves accuracy when the training dataset is small, as well as when data are corrupted by certain types of noise. These results narrow the gap between biological and artificial neural networks and add a new bio-inspired approach to the arsenal of defenses against adversarial examples, which are known threats to model-based optimization and network security. Author summaryThe biophysical properties of a biological neuron enable it to perform both OR-like and AND-like operations over its inputs. In contrast, artificial neural networks use units that always perform only one specific operation. We wondered whether the flexibility observed in individual biological neurons could be incorporated into artificial neural networks without breaking them. If artificial neural networks required their units to perform single operations, then this requirement would either point to a fundamental difference between biological and artificial neural networks or indicate that biological neurons are somehow constrained to perform only one type of operations during object recognition. If, on the other hand, artificial units can flexibly switch between different operations, then such a result would indicate that biological and artificial neural networks are more similar than previously thought and would be an important step towards biomimetic AI. To find out, we introduced a new computational structure we call a flexible layer, in which individual units can switch between operations according to a rule (e.g., depending on input strength, or even randomly). We found that inserting the flexible layer in one or several positions in different artificial neural networks trained on several benchmark datasets not only preserves their accuracy but also makes them more robust to various perturbations and improves learning when training data is scarce.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Teaching deep networks to see shape: Lessons from a simplified visual world. 98%
- Increasing neural network robustness improves match to macaque V1 eigenspectrum, spatial frequency preference and predictivity 97%
- Recurrent neural networks can explain flexible trading of speed and accuracy in biological vision 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantifying the Brain Predictivity of Artificial Neural Networks with Nonlinear Response Mapping 96%
- Back-propagation learning in deep Spike-By-Spike networks 96%
- Leveraging prior concept learning improves ability to generalize from few examples in computational models of human object recognition 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Replay as a basis for backpropagation through time in the brain 95%
- The remarkable robustness of surrogate gradient learning for instilling complex function in spiking neural networks 95%
- Probing the Structure and Functional Properties of the Dropout-induced Correlated Variability in Convolutional Neural Networks 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Small hand-designed convolutional neural networks outperform transfer learning in automated cell shape detection in confluent tissues 95%
- Deep learning models for COVID-19 chest x-ray classification: Preventing shortcut learning using feature disentanglement 95%
- Non-synaptic plasticity enables memory-dependent local learning 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.