Mapping the landscape: A protocol for a jurisdictional scan of self-identified learning health systems
Vanderhout, S.; Bird, M.; Giannarakos, A.; Whitmore, C.
Show abstract
BackgroundThere is a growing movement to implement learning health systems (LHS), in which real-time evidence, informatics, patient-provider partnerships and experiences, and organizational culture are aligned to support improvements in care. However, what constitutes a LHS varies based on context and capacity, hindering standardization, scale-up, and knowledge sharing. Further, LHS often use "usual care" as the benchmark for comparing new approaches to care, but disentangling usual care from multifarious care modalities found across settings is challenging. To advance robust LHS, a comprehensive overview of existing LHS including strengths and opportunities for growth is needed. ObjectivesTo scope and identify international existing LHS to: 1) inform the global landscape of LHS, highlight common strengths, and identify opportunities for growth or improvement; and 2) identify common characteristics, emphases, assumptions, or challenges described in establishing counterfactuals in LHS. MethodsA jurisdictional scan will be conducted according to modified PRISMA guidelines. LHS will be identified through a search of peer-reviewed and grey literature using Ovid Medline, Ebsco CINAHL, Ovid Embase, Clarivate Web of Science, and PubMed Non-Medline databases and the web along with informal discussions with peer LHS experts. Self-identified LHS will be included if they are described in sufficient detail, either in literature or during informal discussions, according to [≥]4 of 10 criteria (core functionalities, analytics, use of evidence, co-design/implementation, evaluation, change management/governance structures, data sharing, knowledge sharing, training/capacity building, equity, sustainability) in an existing framework to characterize LHS. Search results will be screened, extracted, and analyzed to inform two descriptive reviews pertaining to our two main objectives. Data will be extracted according to a pre-specified extraction form and summarized descriptively. ImplicationsThis research will characterize the current landscape of worldwide LHS and provide a foundation for promoting knowledge and resource sharing, identifying next steps for the growth, improvement, and evaluation of LHS.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation Science Protocol for a participatory, theory-informed implementation research programme in the context of health system strengthening in sub-Saharan Africa (ASSET-ImplementER) 95%
- How and why do Quality Circles work for General Practitioners - a realist approach 95%
- The use of the positive deviance approach for healthcare system service improvement: A scoping review protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Knowledge mobilisation of rapid evidence reviews to inform health and social care policy and practice in a public health emergency: appraisal of the Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre processes and impact, 2021-23 93%
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 92%
- STIMULATE-ICP-Delphi (Symptoms, Trajectory, Inequalities and Management: Understanding Long-COVID to Address and Transform Existing Integrated Care Pathways Delphi): Study Protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- National statutory reporting: not even ticking the boxes? The quality of ‘Learning from Deaths’ reporting in Quality Accounts within the NHS in England 2017-2020 91%
- Improving local authority financial support services for users with complex health needs: a mixed-method economic evaluation of Social Navigators in South Tyneside, UK 90%
- Interventions To Improve Patient Safety During The COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Refugee Healthcare Resilience and Burdens: A 10-year Mixed-Methods Analysis of System Shocks in Canada 91%
- The cost of inaction to strengthen the resilience of primary health care in Latin America and the Caribbean: a modelling study 90%
- Impact of healthcare capacity disparities on the COVID-19 vaccination coverage in the United States 85%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.