The prevalence of Fusobacterium nucleatum subspecies in the oral cavity stratifies by local health status
Krieger, M.; AbdelRahman, Y. M.; Choi, D.; Palmer, E. A.; Yoo, A.; McGuire, S.; Kreth, J.; Merritt, J.
Show abstract
The ubiquitous inflammophilic pathobiont Fusobacterium nucleatum is widely recognized for its strong association with a variety of human dysbiotic diseases such as periodontitis and oral/extraoral abscesses, as well as multiple types of cancer. F. nucleatum is currently subdivided into four subspecies: F. nucleatum subspecies nucleatum (Fn. nucleatum), animalis (Fn. animalis), polymorphum (Fn. polymorphum), and vincentii/fusiforme (Fn. vincentii). Although these subspecies have been historically considered as functionally interchangeable in the oral cavity, direct clinical evidence is largely lacking for this assertion. Consequently, we assembled a collection of oral clinical specimens to determine whether F. nucleatum subspecies prevalence in the oral cavity stratifies by local oral health status. Patient-matched clinical specimens of both disease-free dental plaque and odontogenic abscess were analyzed with newly developed culture-dependent and culture-independent approaches using 44 and 60 oral biofilm/tooth abscess paired specimens, respectively. Most oral cavities were found to simultaneously harbor multiple F. nucleatum subspecies, with a greater diversity present within dental plaque compared to abscesses. In dental plaque, Fn. polymorphum is clearly the dominant organism, but this changes dramatically within odontogenic abscesses where Fn. animalis is heavily favored over all other fusobacteria. Surprisingly, the most commonly studied F. nucleatum subspecies, Fn. nucleatum, is only a minor constituent in the oral cavity. To gain further insights into the genetic basis for these phenotypes, we subsequently performed pangenome, phylogenetic, and functional enrichment analyses of oral fusobacterial genomes using the Anvio platform, which revealed significant genotypic distinctions among F. nucleatum subspecies. Accordingly, our results strongly support a taxonomic reassignment of each F. nucleatum subspecies into distinct Fusobacterium species. Of these, Fn. animalis should be considered as the most clinically relevant at sites of active inflammation, despite being among the least characterized oral fusobacteria.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative Characterization Reveals Conserved and Divergent Ecological Traits of Oral Corynebacteria 96%
- Diversity of Treponema denticola and other oral treponeme lineages in subjects with periodontitis and gingivitis 95%
- Heterogeneous lineage-specific arginine deiminase expression within dental microbiome species 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Human Saliva Modifies Growth, Biofilm Architecture and Competitive Behaviors of Oral Streptococci 94%
- The salivary virome during childhood dental caries 93%
- Achromobacter xylosoxidans isolates exhibit genome diversity, variable virulence, high levels of antibiotic resistance and potential intrahost evolution. 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The complexities of inferring symbiont function: Paraburkholderia symbiont dynamics in social amoeba populations and its impact on the amoeba microbiome 94%
- Establishing Conserved Biosynthetic Gene Clusters of the Phylum Myxococcota 93%
- Does strain-level persistence of lactobacilli in long term back-slopped sourdoughs inform on domestication of food-fermenting lactic acid bacteria? 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Fusobacterium nucleatum metabolically integrates commensals and pathogens in oral biofilms 94%
- Quantifying synthetic bacterial community composition with flow cytometry: efficacy in mock communities and challenges in co-cultures 94%
- Species level resolution of female bladder microbiota from 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.