Integrated integral population models
Portillo-Tzompa, P.; Martin-Cornejo, P. R.; Gonzalez, E. J.
Show abstract
O_LIData integration allows obtaining better descriptions and forecasting of a populations behaviour by incorporating data at both the individual and population levels. Structured population models include the matrix population models (MPMs), which structure a population through a discrete state variable, and the integral population models (IPMs), which use a continuous variable. Two decades ago, the integrated version of MPMs appeared, but their corresponding version for IPMs is still missing. C_LIO_LIHere, we propose the integrated integral population model (IIPM). This model takes up the ideas behind existing models used to describe and forecast the dynamics of continuously structured populations: IPMs, which use individual data, and inverse IPMs, which use population data. Particularly, we emphasise the construction and fitting of the IIPM under a Bayesian framework and use the Soay sheep database to compare the population dynamics generated by the IIPM and these existing models. C_LIO_LIThe IIPM constructed with the Soay sheep data had a good performance both at the individual (vital rates) and population (size and structure) levels, because, as they are constrained to fit both sets of data, they produce a balanced population dynamics. In turn, the IPM produced the best individual estimates and the worst population estimates, whilst the inverse IPM produced the worst individual estimates and the best population estimates. C_LIO_LIThe objective of a structured population model should be to correctly describe population patterns. IPMs, by not using population data, fail in this objective. An IIPM solves this problem. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrated Movement Models for Individual Tracking and Species Distribution Data 96%
- Analysing biodiversity observation data collected in continuous time: Should we use discrete- or continuous-time occupancy models? 95%
- Accounting for unobserved spatial variation in step selection analyses of animal movement via spatial random effects 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using known births to account for delayed marking in population estimation of North Atlantic right whales 95%
- Accounting for unobserved population dynamics and aging error in close-kin mark-recapture assessments 95%
- Population genetics meets ecology: a guide to individual-based simulations in continuous landscapes 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Distinguishing within- from between-individual effects: How to use the within-individual centering method for quadratic patterns 93%
- A model-based hypothesis framework to define and estimate the diel niche via the 'Diel.Niche' R package 93%
- Size- and stage-dependence in cause-specific mortality of migratory brown trout 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modelling spatially autocorrelated detection probabilities in spatial capture-recapture using random effects 94%
- ecode: An R package to investigate community dynamics in ordinary differential equation systems 93%
- Managed culls mean extinction for a marine mammal population when combined with extreme climate impacts 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Accounting for observation biases associated with counts of young when estimating fecundity: case study on the arboreal-nesting red kite (Milvus milvus) 96%
- Using informative priors to account for identifiability issues in occupancy models with identification errors 94%
- Unravelling the effects of heterogeneity in space use on estimates of connectivity and population size: Insights from spatial capture-recapture modelling 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.