Back

Prediction of response to transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for depression using electroencephalography and statistical learning methods, including an out-of-sample validation

Bailey, N. W.; Fulcher, B. D.; Arns, M.; Fitzgerald, P. B.; Fitzgibbon, B. M.; van Dijk, H.

2023-10-25 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2023.10.24.23297492 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has shown efficacy for treating depression, but not for all patients. Accurate treatment response prediction could lower treatment burden. Research suggests machine learning trained with electroencephalographic (EEG) data may predict response, but only a limited range of measures have been tested. ObjectivesWe used >7000 time-series features to comprehensively test whether rTMS treatment response could be predicted in a discovery dataset and an independent dataset. MethodsBaseline EEG from 188 patients with depression treated with rTMS (125 responders) were decomposed into the top five principal components (PCs). The hctsa toolbox was used to extract 7304 time-series features from each participant and PC. A classification algorithm was trained to predict responders from the feature matrix separately for each PC. The classifier was applied to an independent dataset (N = 58) to test generalizability on an unseen sample. ResultsWithin the discovery dataset, the third PC (which showed a posterior-maximum and prominent alpha power) showed above-chance classification accuracy (68%, pFDR = 0.005, normalised positive predictive value = 114%). Other PCs did not outperform chance. The model generalized to the independent dataset with above-chance balanced accuracy (60%, p = 0.046, normalised positive predictive value = 114%). Analysis of feature-clusters suggested responders showed more high frequency power relative to total power, and a more negative skew in the distribution of their time-series values. ConclusionThe dynamical properties of PC3 predicted treatment response with moderate accuracy, which generalized to an independent dataset. Results suggest treatment stratification from pre-treatment EEG may be possible, potentially enabling better outcomes than one-size-fits-all treatment approaches.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
37.1%
2
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
8.3%
3
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.2%
5
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.1%
6
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
7
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.0%
8
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
9
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
10
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
11
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
12
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.6%
13
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
14
Journal of Psychopharmacology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
15
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.2%
17
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
18
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
19
European Neuropsychopharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
20
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 77%
0.7%
22
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
25
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%