Prediction of response to transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for depression using electroencephalography and statistical learning methods, including an out-of-sample validation
Bailey, N. W.; Fulcher, B. D.; Arns, M.; Fitzgerald, P. B.; Fitzgibbon, B. M.; van Dijk, H.
Show abstract
BackgroundRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has shown efficacy for treating depression, but not for all patients. Accurate treatment response prediction could lower treatment burden. Research suggests machine learning trained with electroencephalographic (EEG) data may predict response, but only a limited range of measures have been tested. ObjectivesWe used >7000 time-series features to comprehensively test whether rTMS treatment response could be predicted in a discovery dataset and an independent dataset. MethodsBaseline EEG from 188 patients with depression treated with rTMS (125 responders) were decomposed into the top five principal components (PCs). The hctsa toolbox was used to extract 7304 time-series features from each participant and PC. A classification algorithm was trained to predict responders from the feature matrix separately for each PC. The classifier was applied to an independent dataset (N = 58) to test generalizability on an unseen sample. ResultsWithin the discovery dataset, the third PC (which showed a posterior-maximum and prominent alpha power) showed above-chance classification accuracy (68%, pFDR = 0.005, normalised positive predictive value = 114%). Other PCs did not outperform chance. The model generalized to the independent dataset with above-chance balanced accuracy (60%, p = 0.046, normalised positive predictive value = 114%). Analysis of feature-clusters suggested responders showed more high frequency power relative to total power, and a more negative skew in the distribution of their time-series values. ConclusionThe dynamical properties of PC3 predicted treatment response with moderate accuracy, which generalized to an independent dataset. Results suggest treatment stratification from pre-treatment EEG may be possible, potentially enabling better outcomes than one-size-fits-all treatment approaches.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhanced network synchronization connectivity following transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in bipolar depression: effects on EEG oscillations and deep learning-based predictors of clinical remission 96%
- Increased low-frequency brain responses to music after psilocybin therapy for depression 95%
- Disrupted Limbic-Prefrontal Effective Connectivity in Response to Fearful Faces in Lifetime Depression 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Unraveling Neural Complexity: Exploring Brain Entropy to Yield Mechanistic Insight in Neuromodulation Therapies for Tobacco Use Disorder 95%
- Validating genuine changes in Heartbeat Evoked Potentials using Pseudotrials and Surrogate Procedures 94%
- Mindfulness-based Neurofeedback: A Systematic Review of EEG and fMRI studies 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting depression risk in early adolescence via multimodal brain imaging 93%
- Contralateral Prefrontal and Network Engagement during Left DLPFC 10 Hz rTMS: An Interleaved TMS-fMRI Study in Healthy Adults 93%
- Linking alpha oscillations, attention and inhibitory control in adult ADHD with EEG neurofeedback 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ketamine and attentional bias to threat: dynamic causal modeling of magnetoencephalographic connectivity in treatment-resistant depression 95%
- Altered EEG resting-state large-scale brain network dynamics in euthymic bipolar disorder patients 93%
- Causality analysis in major depressive disorder for early prediction of treatment outcomes with pharmacological and neuromodulation therapies 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.