Back

Effect of homotypic vs. heterotypic interactions on the cellular uptake of extracellular vesicles

Jhaveri, J. R.; Khare, P.; Kamte, Y. S.; Chandwani, M. N.; Pinky, P. P.; Milosevic, J.; Abraham, N.; Zheng, S.-y.; O'Donnell, L.; Manickam, D. S.

2023-10-25 bioengineering
10.1101/2023.10.23.563628 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Extracellular vehicles (EVs) are an emerging class of drug carriers and are primarily reported to be internalized into recipient cells via a combination of endocytic routes such as clathrin-mediated, caveolae-mediated and macropinocytosis pathways. In this work, (1) we investigated potential effects of homotypic vs. heterotypic interactions by studying the cellular uptake of homologous EVs (EV donor cells and recipient cells of the same type) vs. heterologous EVs (EV donor cells and recipient cells of different types) and (2) determined the route of EV internalization into low pinocytic/hard-to-deliver cell models such as brain endothelial cells (BECs). We used BECs and macrophages as low-pinocytic and phagocytic cell models, respectively, to study the effect of homotypic vs. heterotypic interactions on EV uptake in the recipient cells. Homotypic interactions led to a greater extent of uptake into the recipient BECs compared to heterotypic interactions. However, we did not see a complete reduction in EV uptake into recipient BECs when endocytic pathways were blocked using pharmacological inhibitors. Our results suggest that EVs primarily use membrane fusion to enter low-pinocytic recipient BECs instead of relying on endocytosis. Lipophilic PKH67 dye-labeled EVs but not intravesicular esterase-activated calcein ester-labeled EVs severely reduced particle uptake into BECs while phagocytic macrophages internalized both types of EV-labeled particles to comparable extents. Our results also highlight the importance of carefully choosing labeling dye chemistry to study EV uptake, especially in the case of low pinocytic cells such as BECs. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=171 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/563628v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (54K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@d5cb50org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@172d1dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@192caf6org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@4b16ba_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Pharmaceutics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.3%
2
Molecular Pharmaceutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
3
Journal of Controlled Release
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
4
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
5
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
6
Biomaterials Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.6%
9
Journal of Extracellular Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
10
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
11
Advanced Therapeutics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.8%
13
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Langmuir
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
15
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
Small
70 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
17
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
18
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
19
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
20
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
21
Bioactive Materials
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
22
Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
25
Cytotherapy
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
26
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
27
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
28
Journal of Nanobiotechnology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
29
Nanoscale Advances
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
30
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%