Influenza Hospitalisations in England during the 2022/23 Season: do different data sources drive divergence in modelled waves? A comparison of surveillance and administrative data.
Mellor, J.; Christie, R.; Guilder, J.; Paton, R. S.; Elgohari, S.; Watson, C.; Deeny, S.; Ward, T.
Show abstract
BackgroundAccurate and representative data is vital for precisely reporting the impact of influenza in healthcare systems. Northern hemisphere winter 2022/23 experienced the most substantial influenza wave since the COVID-19 pandemic began in 2020. Simultaneously, new data streams become available within health services because of the pandemic. Comparing these data, surveillance and administrative, supports the accurate monitoring of population level disease trends. MethodsWe analysed admissions rates per capita from four different collection mechanisms covering National Health Service hospital Trusts in England over the winter 2022/23 wave. We adjust for difference in reporting and extracted key epidemic characteristics including the maximum admission rate, peak timing, cumulative season admissions and growth rates by fitting generalised additive models at national and regional levels. ResultsBy modelling the admission rates per capita across surveillance and administrative data systems we show that different data measuring the epidemic produce different estimates of key quantities. Nationally and in most regions the data correspond well for the maximum admission rate, date of peak and growth rate, however, in subnational analysis discrepancies in estimates arose, particularly for the cumulative admission rate. InterpretationThis research shows that the choice of data used to measure seasonal influenza epidemics can influence analysis substantially at sub-national levels. For the admission rate per capita there is comparability in the sentinel surveillance approach (which has other important functions), rapid situational reports, operational databases and time lagged administrative data giving assurance in their combined value. Utilising multiple sources of data aids understanding of the impact of seasonal influenza epidemics in the population.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Limits of lockdown: characterising essential contacts during strict physical distancing 91%
- Forecasting influenza incidence as an ordinal variable using machine learning 91%
- Improving modelling for epidemic responses: reflections from members of the UK infectious disease modelling community on their experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk factors, symptom reporting, healthcare-seeking behaviour and adherence to public health guidance: protocol for Virus Watch, a prospective community cohort study 94%
- A Deep Recurrent Reinforced Learning model to compare the efficacy of targeted local vs. national measures on the spread of COVID-19 in the UK 94%
- COVID-19 outbreak rates and infection attack rates associated with the workplace: a descriptive epidemiological study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Oxford-AstraZeneca) vaccines for reducing susceptibility to infection with the Delta variant (B.1.617.2) of SARS-CoV-2 92%
- Estimates of epidemiological parameters for H5N1 influenza in humans: a rapid review 91%
- Changing patterns of SARS-CoV-2 infection through Delta and Omicron waves by vaccination status, previous infection and neighbourhood deprivation: A cohort analysis of 2.7M people 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.