Back

Influenza Hospitalisations in England during the 2022/23 Season: do different data sources drive divergence in modelled waves? A comparison of surveillance and administrative data.

Mellor, J.; Christie, R.; Guilder, J.; Paton, R. S.; Elgohari, S.; Watson, C.; Deeny, S.; Ward, T.

2023-10-20 epidemiology
10.1101/2023.10.19.23297248 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAccurate and representative data is vital for precisely reporting the impact of influenza in healthcare systems. Northern hemisphere winter 2022/23 experienced the most substantial influenza wave since the COVID-19 pandemic began in 2020. Simultaneously, new data streams become available within health services because of the pandemic. Comparing these data, surveillance and administrative, supports the accurate monitoring of population level disease trends. MethodsWe analysed admissions rates per capita from four different collection mechanisms covering National Health Service hospital Trusts in England over the winter 2022/23 wave. We adjust for difference in reporting and extracted key epidemic characteristics including the maximum admission rate, peak timing, cumulative season admissions and growth rates by fitting generalised additive models at national and regional levels. ResultsBy modelling the admission rates per capita across surveillance and administrative data systems we show that different data measuring the epidemic produce different estimates of key quantities. Nationally and in most regions the data correspond well for the maximum admission rate, date of peak and growth rate, however, in subnational analysis discrepancies in estimates arose, particularly for the cumulative admission rate. InterpretationThis research shows that the choice of data used to measure seasonal influenza epidemics can influence analysis substantially at sub-national levels. For the admission rate per capita there is comparability in the sentinel surveillance approach (which has other important functions), rapid situational reports, operational databases and time lagged administrative data giving assurance in their combined value. Utilising multiple sources of data aids understanding of the impact of seasonal influenza epidemics in the population.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.6%
2
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.3%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
10.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.4%
6
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.4%
7
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.0%
8
Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses
44 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.7%
10
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
11
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
12
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
13
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
15
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
16
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
17
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
19
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
20
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%