Telephone advice lines available out-of-hours to people with palliative and end-of-life care needs: a qualitative interview study with professionals and development of a practical framework to improve services
Pask, S.; Omoruyi, A.; Mohamed, A.; Chambers, R. L.; McFarlane, P. G.; Johansson, T.; Kumar, R.; Woodhead, A.; Okamoto, I.; Barclay, S.; Higginson, I. J.; Sleeman, K. E.; Murtagh, F. E.
Show abstract
BackgroundPeople living at home with advanced illness require around-the-clock care. Telephone-based advice lines are critical for accessing help, yet evidence is limited. AimTo explore out-of-hours telephone-based advice lines available to adults living at home with advanced illness and their carers across the UK, and construct a practical framework to improve services. DesignStructured qualitative interviews with thematic analysis. A patient and public involvement workshop was conducted to refine the proposed framework. Setting/participantsProfessionals with palliative/end-of-life care commissioning responsibilities, or knowledge of out-of-hours service provision, were purposively sampled to ensure UK-wide representation. ResultsSeventy-one interviews were conducted, covering 60 geographical areas. Five themes were identified. Availability: Ten models of advice lines were described. Variation led to confusion about who to call and when. Accessibility, awareness and promotion: It was assumed that patients/carers know who to call out-of-hours, but often they did not. Practicalities: Call handlers skills/expertise varied, which influenced how calls were managed. Possible responses ranged from simply signposting to organising home visits. Integration/continuity of care: Integration between care providers was limited by electronic medical records access and information sharing. Service structure/commissioning: Sustained funding was often an issue for charitably funded organisations. ConclusionsMultiple advice lines lead to confusion and delays in obtaining care, as many default to general out-of-hours advice lines. Dedicated advice lines are valuable for patients with advanced illness as long as they are implemented well. A practical framework (including a comprehensive overview of components) is provided for guiding how these are delivered. Key statementsWhat is already known about the topic? O_LIPeople living at home with advanced illness and those that care for them need access to dedicated palliative and end-of-life care 24 hours a day, 7-days a week. C_LIO_LIWhile understanding of telephone advice lines often exists at a single service level, there is limited knowledge in terms of national provision. C_LI What does this paper add? O_LIThis qualitative study provides an understanding of multiple telephone-based advice line services available out-of-hours at a national-level, and identifies a lack of consistency and challenges with integration between available services. C_LIO_LIPromotion of dedicated advice lines (or an area equivalent) needs to ensure that people with advanced illness are aware of how to access such support, but there is variation in how this is done. C_LIO_LIIncorporating the views of patients with advanced illness and carers in the development of telephone-based advice is essential to ensure the care delivered is centred around their needs. C_LI Implications for practice, theory or policy O_LIThe practical framework developed in this research (using key considerations from professionals based on structured interviews and a patient and public involvement workshop) can be used to guide commissioners and service providers. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- ‘Necessity is the mother of invention’: Specialist palliative care service innovation and practice change in response to COVID-19. Results from a multi-national survey (CovPall) 99%
- Understanding and addressing challenges for Advance Care Planning in the COVID-19 pandemic: An analysis of the UK CovPall survey data from specialist palliative care services 98%
- Addressing barriers to interprofessional working with homecare workers in community palliative care: insights from a multi-site qualitative case study in England 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Support and follow-up needs of patients discharged from Intensive Care after severe COVID-19: a mixed-methods study of the views of UK general practitioners and intensive care staff during the pandemic’s first wave 96%
- The Impact on Staff of Providing Non-Invasive Advanced Respiratory Support During the Covid-19 Pandemic A Qualitative Study in an Acute Hospital 95%
- Adverse event reviews in healthcare: What matters to patients and their family? A qualitative study exploring the perspective of patients and family 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Community end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic: Initial findings of a UK primary care survey 97%
- Integrating primary care and social services for older adults with multimorbidity: A qualitative study 95%
- A mixed-methods evaluation of patients’ views on primary care multi-disciplinary teams in Scotland 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- An observational study of survival outcomes of people referred for ‘fast-track’ end-of-life care funding in a District General Hospital; too little too late? 96%
- National statutory reporting: not even ticking the boxes? The quality of ‘Learning from Deaths’ reporting in Quality Accounts within the NHS in England 2017-2020 94%
- Improving local authority financial support services for users with complex health needs: a mixed-method economic evaluation of Social Navigators in South Tyneside, UK 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Uncertainty in serious illness: A national interdisciplinary consensus exercise to identify clinical research priorities 94%
- Capturing the experiences of UK healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A structural topic modelling analysis of 7,412 free-text survey responses 94%
- A mixed-methods multi-site case study of a person-centred intervention for constant observation in hospitals with people living with dementia 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.